Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The deepest foundation of our democratic crisis

Bibliographic Data

ID6297948
AuthorsJoanna Mansbridge (0000-0002-5454-640X, Harvard University, corresponding author), Jane Mansbridge (Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, USA)
Year2025
Volume46
Issue1
Pages3-17
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-5121 • E-ISSN: 1460-373X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/01925121231203719
OpenAlexW4390051178
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited32

The deepest foundation of our democratic crisis is our increasing human interdependence. That interdependence creates increasing needs for ‘free-use goods’: goods that, once produced, anyone can use without paying (other names: “public goods,” “non-excludable goods”). Such goods produce the classic “free-rider” problems to which the most efficient solution in societies of strangers is usually government provision through taxes or regulation, both of which depend on a combination of voluntarism (based on duty and solidarity) and legitimate coercion. More interdependence creates more free-rider problems, which require more government intervention/coercion. Our eighteenth-century democratic mechanisms were not designed to legitimate the amount of state coercion we now need. To bolster legitimacy, we need to embrace the logic of free-use goods and replace one-way with recursive representation, the principle of distinction with more descriptive representation, corruption with clean institutions, and legislative-centric democracy with a full representative system approach, all drawing on our collective intelligence

Coercion (linguistics · Democracy · Economics · Free rider problem · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Legislature · Legitimacy · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Public good · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Should We Use Citizens' Assemblies to Make Health Policy

    Open Access•Daniel Hutton Ferris, Johannes Knie•Bioethics•2026

  • The Oasis and the Mirage. Lottocracy as a Test for Democratic Theory

    Open Access•Théophile Pénigaud de Mourgues•OEconomia•2025

  • Rethinking Democratic Norms in Responsiveness Theory

    Open Access•Zihan Xu•Political Studies Review•2025

  • Representation Failure

    Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•Democratic Failure•2020

  • Schools of Thought

    David E Apter, Kaushik Basu et al.•Schools of Thought•2002

  • The Principles of Representative Government

    Open Access•Bernard Manin•Principles of Representative…•1997

  • Politics with the People

    Michael A Neblo, Kevin M Esterling et al.•Politics with the People•2018

  • Voice, Trust, and Memory

    Open Access•Melissa S Williams, Melissa Williams•Voice, Trust, and Memory•1998

  • A Fine is a Price

    Open Access•Uri Gneezy, Aldo Rustichini•The Journal of Legal Studies•2000

  • Recursive Representation

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•Constitutionalism and a Right to…•2022

  • Runaway World

    Open Access•Anthony Giddens•Rugman reviews international…•2009

  • Corruption

    Ray Fisman, Miriam A Golden et al.•Corruption•2017

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure

    Paul A Samuelson•The Review of Economics and…•1954

  • Populism and Democratic Theory

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Stephen Macedo•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2019

  • The representative system

    Felipe Rey•Critical Review of International…•2020

  • Anti-corruption

    Bo Rothstein•Review of International Political…•2011

  • The Place of Self‐Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge et al.•Journal of Political Philosophy•2009

  • Trust games

    Open Access•Noel D Johnson, Alexandra Mislin et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2011

  • Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State

    I M D Little, W J Baumol•Economica•1953

  • Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations

    Open Access•Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci•Contemporary Educational Psychology•2000

  • What Is Populism

    Jan-Werner Müller, Jan‐werner Müller•What Is Populism?•2016

  • "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes

    Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • What Satisfaction with Democracy? A Global Analysis of “Satisfaction with Democracy” Measures

    Open Access•Viktor Valgarðsson, Viktor Orri Valgarðsson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • What Is Political Science For

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • Cooperative and competitive behavior in mixed-motive games

    Open Access•Philip S Gallo, Charles G Mcclintock•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1965

  • Catching the ‘Deliberative Wave’? How (Disaffected) Citizens Assess Deliberative Citizen Forums

    Open Access•Steven Goldberg, André Bächtiger•British Journal of Political…•2023

  • Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Cassius Alvares, Ray Dagapioso et al.•Research Methods in Deliberative…•2022

  • Ending Footbinding and Infibulation

    Gerry Mackie•American Sociological Review•1996

  • The Irony of Modern Democracy and Efforts to Improve its Practice

    Open Access•Philippe C Schmitter•Politics & Society•1992

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae