Should participatory opportunities be a component of democratic quality? The role of citizen views in resolving a conceptual controversy

Bibliographic Data

ID6299064
AuthorsBrigitte Geissel (0000-0002-1310-949X, Goethe University Frankfurt, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume37
Issue5
Pages656-665
Publication date2016-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-5121 • E-ISSN: 1460-373X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0192512116645139
OpenAlexW2551518288
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited23

There is consensus in quality-of-democracy research on the role of electoral participation, but what about participatory opportunities beyond elections? Non-electoral participatory opportunities have been neglected in most measurements. Recent indices, however, include these opportunities as indicators of democratic quality. Should non-electoral participatory opportunities be considered an essential component of democratic quality? To answer this question and to address the controversy, I examined three established approaches. On the basis of this examination, it became clear that a novel approach was necessary. By applying the recently emerging debate on ‘democratising’ the definition of democracy, I argue that the controversy among experts needs to be connected to citizens’ concepts. An approach that takes citizens’ concepts into account implies several conceptual as well as methodological challenges. The paper suggests some solutions

Citizen journalism · Component (thermodynamics · Conceptual framework · Democracy · Epistemology · Participatory democracy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Social science · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub