Can we reconcile? Understanding the multi-level challenges of conflict transformation

Bibliographic Data

ID6299388
AuthorsSarah Maddison (0000-0003-4641-2396, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume38
Issue2
Pages155-168
Publication date2017-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-5121 • E-ISSN: 1460-373X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0192512115607953
OpenAlexW2594251196
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited31

Reconciliation and conflict transformation require simultaneous effort across several socio-political levels. This article advances both a conceptual and an empirical argument to frame reconciliation and conflict transformation in these terms. First, the article draws on theories of agonistic democracy to argue for the intrinsic and potentially productive role of non-violent conflict in reconciliation efforts that accept conflict as both enduring and necessary. Second, the article contends that reconciliation is a multi-level task that requires ongoing attention and effort directed towards constitution building, institutional reform and relational transformation. The article concludes that, once conflict transformation is understood in these terms, reconciliation must be seen as a far more difficult and long-term endeavour than is usually acknowledged, requiring innovative political institutions capable of keeping open spaces for democratic political contestation

Argument (complex analysis · Conflict transformation · Constitution · Democracy · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Transformation (genetics · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub