Foreign policy decision-making within authoritarian contexts
Al-Sisi’s foreign policy (2014–2024)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6299644 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shaimaa Magued (0000-0003-4190-3188, Cairo University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 592-609 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0192-5121 • E-ISSN: 1460-373X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01925121241293130 |
| OpenAlex | W4404828942 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 48 |
How do authoritarian rulers make foreign policy decisions? Building on the triangulation of three qualitative research methods, I advance a theoretical construct that deconstructs authoritarian regimes’ decision-making processes in foreign policy. Drawing inspiration from al-Sisi’s foreign policy, this study argues that authoritarian rulers adopt three types of decision-making tools, which consist of structural control, the prioritization of securing external support and elite material benefits over citizens’ wellbeing, and the repression of opponents beyond national borders. Although scholars have emphasized authoritarian regimes’ instrumentalization of foreign policy as a means of rule consolidation, they have overlooked their prevalent decision-making mechanisms and tools. Building on an inductive research approach, this study triangulates data collected using 3 qualitative research methods, 20 open-ended and semi-structured expert interviews, the analysis of newsfeed content, and discourse analysis of al-Sisi speeches from 2014 to 2024. A rigorous cross-validation of data confirmed the replicability of al-Sisi’s threefold foreign policy decision-making tools across authoritarian and hybrid regimes
Authoritarianism · Democracy · Economics · Foreign policy · Foreign policy analysis · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Egypt's Foreign Policy in Times of Crisis
Presumptive Meanings
Between Peace and War
Essence of Decision
A Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective on the Domestic Politics Turn in IR Theory
Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics
Liberalization against Democracy
The Foreign Policies of Arab States
The Foreign Policies of Middle East States
Mindscapes
The Middle East in International Relations
Foreign Policy Analysis
Bringing FPA Back Home
Obama's Surge
Modern Syrian Politics
Populism and foreign policy
The Power of Human Cognition in the Study of World Politics
Who Leads Matters
Leader Influence in Role Selection Choices
The formulation and implementation of populist foreign policy
Democracy, Civil Liberties and the Role of Religion after the Arab Awakening
Egyptian foreign policy after the 2011 revolution
The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s transnational advocacy in Turkey
Turkey's Foreign Policy in Post‐Soviet Eurasia
Critical Discourse Analysis
Beyond Arabism vs. sovereignty
Philosophy In Revolution
Sectarianism' and Its Discontents in the Study of the Middle East
Iran's International Posture After the Fall of Baghdad
Bureaucratic Politics
The ‘incomplete’ failure of political Islam
Democratization by Elections? Competitive Clientelism in the Middle East
Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders
Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How
Authoritarian persistence, democratization theory and the Middle East
Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East
The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East
Strategies for Reviving the International Relations/Middle East Nexus after the Arab Uprisings
Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change
The Foreign Policies of Arab States
IR in the Middle East
Understanding regime divergence in the post-uprising Arab states
Regime cycles and political change in African autocracies
Egyptian Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy Specificity
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |