Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Democracy in the prison of political science

Bibliographic Data

ID6299734
AuthorsFelipe Antunes De Oliveira (0000-0002-7986-6047, University of Sussex, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume43
Issue5
Pages648-661
Publication date2022-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-5121 • E-ISSN: 1460-373X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0192512120932435
OpenAlexW3048238583
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

After the Brexit vote and the election of Donald Trump, a widespread perception emerged that the world was witnessing a crisis of liberal democracy. Not surprisingly, said crisis is at the core of a new batch of political science literature. This review article takes stock of some key contributions to the literature, namely Albright (2018), Levitsky and Ziblatt (2018), Norris and Inglehart (2018), Runciman (2018a) and Eatwell and Goodwin (2018). My key argument is that the reviewed books are fundamentally limited by problematic ontological assumptions stemming from artificial disciplinary boundaries. Privileging either individual traits of authoritarian leaders or the very specific experience of the USA or the UK, they fail to capture varied, yet deeply interconnected international expressions of contemporary authoritarianism. Following Justin Rosenberg’s open invitation to place the concept of multiplicity at the centre of a renewed research agenda, I suggest that a more holistic take on the crisis of democracy requires a renewed attention to inter-societal dynamics

Argument (complex analysis · Authoritarianism · Brexit · Democracy · Economics · European union · Liberal democracy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Prison · Social science · Sociology · Law · Religion and Society Interactions · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

  • Rethinking democratic subversion

    Andreas Schedler•The Routledge Handbook of…•2024

  • Argentine democracy

    Steven Levitsky•Argentine democracy•2005

  • How the West Came to Rule

    Alexander Anievas, Kerem Nişancıoğlu et al.•How the West Came to Rule•2015

  • The School of the Americas

    Open Access•L Gill, Emily S Rosenberg et al.•School of the Americas•2004

  • Crisis construal in the North Atlantic Financial Crisis and the Eurozone crisis

    Open Access•B Jessop•Competition & Change•2015

  • The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes

    Juan J Linz, Juan Linz et al.•The Breakdown of Democratic…•1978

  • Citizens and Others

    Open Access•G K Bhambra•Alternatives Global Local Political•2015

  • Deepening ‘multiplicity’

    Open Access•Brieg Powel•International Relations•2018

  • Fascism and Dictatorship

    Nicos Poulantzas•Fascism and Dictatorship•2019

  • Brexit, Trump, and 'methodological whiteness

    Open Access•G K Bhambra•British Journal of Sociology•2017

  • International Relations in the prison of Political Science

    Open Access•J Rosenberg•International Relations•2016

  • A prison break into the past? A comment on Justin Rosenberg's 'International Relations in the prison of Political Science

    Open Access•Hannes Peltonen•International Relations•2018

  • Societies are not the only source of multiplicity

    Open Access•Olaf Corry•International Relations•2018

  • Extreme right-wing political violence and terrorism

    Penelope Eate•Social Identities•2013

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae