Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Making Making Social Science Matter Matter To Us

Bibliographic Data

ID6299767
AuthorsRobert Adcock (Department of Political Science, 2115 G St NW, Suite 440B, Washington DC 20052, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume21
Issue1
Pages97-112
Publication date2009-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Theoretical Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-6298 • E-ISSN: 1460-3667
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0951629808097285
OpenAlexW2031394815
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited12

This article pursues two line of inquiry in response to Bent Flyvbjerg's advocacy of a phronetic social science in Making Social Science Matter (2001). First, I explore how Flyvbjerg's manifesto relates to the approach employed in his earlier empirical work, Rationality & Power (1998). There are, I argue, notable disjunctions between the practice of Rationality & Power and the preaching of Making Social Science Matter. Second, I explicate and rework Flyvbjerg's contrast between epistemic and phronetic social science with an eye to its reception by a specific disciplinary audience: American political scientists. In doing so, I build on several contributions to Sanford Schram and Brian Caterino's edited volume Making Political Science Matter (2006). My aspiration is, however, rather different from that of the volume: I strive to make epistemic and phronetic into accessible categories of reformist reflection, not provocative banners under which to marshal revolutionary opposition to our disciplinary mainstream(s

Discipline · Epistemology · Mainstream · Manifesto · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Rationality · Social science · Sociology · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Law · Philosophy · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Science and Policy Research

  • Phronetic legal inquiry An effective design for law and society research

    Brendon Murphy, Jeffrey Mcgee•Griffith Law Review•2015

  • Response 2

    Open Access•Tony Fitzpatrick•Journal of Social Policy•2011

  • Choices for Chinese Political Science

    Open Access•Jon R Taylor•Journal of Chinese Political…•2009

  • Who are we?

    Samuel P Huntington•Who are we?•2004

  • Rationality and power

    Bent Flyvbjerg•Rationality and power•1998

  • Making Social Science Matter

    Open Access•Bent Flyvbjerg, Steven Sampson•Making Social Science Matter•2001

  • The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order

    Samuel P Huntington, Ṣalāḥ Qanṣūh et al.•Clash of Civilizations and the…•1996

  • Forced synthesis of trace amounts of juvenile hormone II from propionate by corpora allata of a juvenile hormone III-producing insect

    Open Access•Ira Katznelson, R Feyereisen et al.•Experientia•1988

  • Bowling Alone

    Jim Keddy, J L Keddy•Spiritus•2001

  • American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality

    Open Access•American Political Science Association Task Force•Perspectives on Politics•2004

  • Social Science in Society

    Theodore R Schatzki, Ted Schatzki•Inquiry•2002

Citations per year0.18
Citation span2009 - 2015 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae