The Effect of Global Environmental Regimes
A Measurement Concept
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6299876 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Detlef F Sprinz (0000-0002-2255-6988, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), University of Potsdam, corresponding author), Carsten Helm (0000-0002-4884-163X, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Humboldt University, Berlin, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 359-369 |
| Publication date | 1999-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0192-5121 • E-ISSN: 1460-373X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0192512199204003 |
| OpenAlex | W2161761531 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
| References cited | 26 |
The article outlines a method to measure the effect which international regimes have on solving global environmental problems such as global climate change. By using political-economic cost/benefit analysis, a no-regime counterfactual and a collective optimum (lower and upper bounds) are derived. By comparing the actual performance of a regime to these bounds, a simple coefficient of regime effectiveness can be computed. After theoretically deriving the various bounds, the authors discuss the determining factors and provide guidance on how such a research agenda could be pursued empirically. The authors conclude with suggestions to further refine the measurement concept and its merit for public policy
Counterfactual thinking · Econometrics · Economics · Measure (data warehouse · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Simple (philosophy · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Computer Science · Global trade and economics · International Development and Aid · Psychology
Methodological Challenges in the Study of Regime Effectiveness
Democracy in Global Environmental Governance
Enforcing the Climate Regime
The effectiveness of soft law in international environmental regimes
Environmental regime effectiveness and the North American Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
Dealing with the temporal domain of regime effectiveness
The Wrong Solution at the Right Time
Problem Structure, Institutional Design, and the Relative Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements
Inferences and Indices
The Oslo-Potsdam Solution to Measuring Regime Effectiveness
A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating International Environmental Regimes
Determining Regime Effectiveness
Environmental cooperation of Northeast Asia
Empty Institutions in Global Environmental Politics
Evaluating the success of international environmental regimes
The shift towards an eco-welfare state
Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes
Actors, Norms, and Impact
Como saber se as convenções internacionais de meio ambiente realmente funcionam? abordagens teórico-metodológicas sobre a eficácia dos regimes ambientais
O uso de estudos de caso em pesquisas sobre política ambiental
International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability
Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change
Polar politics
After Hegemony
Regime theory and international relations
The Internationalization of Environmental Protection
International Cooperation
The Rise of International Environmental Politics
Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics
Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental institutions
Power and interdependence
Institutions for environmental aid
The Concept of Regime `Effectiveness
Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science
Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes
The politics of international regime formation
On compliance
The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy
Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control
The origins and sustainability of Mexico's free trade policy
Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.81 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2023 (24) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |