Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Testing Spatial Models of Elections

The Influence of Voters and Elites on Candidate Issue Positions

Bibliographic Data

ID6299971
AuthorsJohn P Frendreis (0000-0001-6026-3265, Loyola University Chicago), John Frendreis, Alan R Gitelson (Loyola University Chicago), Shannon Jenkins (0000-0002-1579-171X, Central Michigan University), Douglas D Roscoe (0000-0002-9471-405X, Central Michigan University)
Year2003
Volume28
Issue1
Pages77-101
Publication date2003-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3162/036298003x200818
OpenAlexW1976990144
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited42

This research tests spatial models of electoral competition using survey data on state legislative candidates' policy positions and ideology in eight U.S. states. Our data support several hypotheses: 1) candidates' issue positions do not converge; 2) party elites have more extreme positions than do candidates; 3) candidate issue positioning is a function of party‐elite issue positions and union involvement in the campaign, as well as constituency characteristics; and 4) when candidates rely heavily on elite resources during their campaign, elites become more important in shaping candidate issue positions

Competition (biology · Elite · Function (biology · Ideology · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • Tax Policy, Tax Competition, and Fiscal Rules

    Eckhard Janeba•FinanzArchiv•2014

  • How Gender Influences Roll Call Voting

    Open Access•Shannon Jenkins•Social Science Quarterly•2012

  • Sex differences in budgetary preferences among Flemish local politicians

    Open Access•Caroline Slegten, Benny Geys et al.•Acta Politica•2019

  • Campaign Dynamics of the Top-Two Primary

    Steven Sparks•Representation•2020

  • A Gendered Pipeline? The Advancement of State Legislators to Congress in Five States

    Open Access•Mack Mariani, Mack D Mariani•Politics & Gender•2008

  • Polarization and the Top-Two Primary

    Steven Sparks•Political Communication•2019

  • Strategic party heterogeneity

    Open Access•Georgia Kernell•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2016

  • Downs and Two-Party Convergence

    B Grofman•Annual Review of Political Science•2004

  • Policy Responsiveness and Incumbent Reelection in State Legislatures

    Open Access•R Edward Hogan•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Do Parties Make a Difference?

    Open Access•Richard Rose•Do Parties Make a Difference?•1980

  • A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates

    Martin J Osborne, Alan Slivinski•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1996

  • Spatial Equilibrium with Entry

    Thomas R Palfrey•The Review of Economic Studies•1984

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • The Changing American Voter

    Norman H Nie, Sidney Verba et al.•Changing American Voter•1979

  • The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics

    Philip E Converse•Politisk Psykologi•2010

  • Electoral equilibria with entry

    Open Access•Bruce Bender, Timothy C Haas•Public Choice•1996

  • On the power and importance of the mean preference in a mathematical model of democratic choice

    Open Access•Otto A Davis, Melvin J Hinich•Public Choice•1968

  • PACs, lobbies and political conflict

    Open Access•Laura I Langbein, Laura Langbein•Public Choice•1993

  • Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections

    Jon R Bond, Cary R Covington et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Policy Congruence and American State Elites

    Eric M Uslaner, R Weber et al.•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Do Parties Make a Difference? The Role of Party Organizations in Congressional Elections

    Paul S Herrnson•The Journal of Politics•1986

  • Computer Simulation of State Electorates

    R Weber, Ronald E Weber et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1972

  • Ideological Thinking Among Mass Publics and Political Elites

    M Kent Jenning, M Kent Jennings•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  • The Impact of Local Party Activity Upon the Electorate

    Daniel Katz, Samuel J Eldersveld•Public Opinion Quarterly•1961

  • Wielding the Stick Instead of the Carrot

    Open Access•Steven T Engel, Steven Engel et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Bringing home the votes

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira, Samuel C Patterson•Political Behavior•1982

  • Knowing One's District

    Robert S Erikson, Norman R Luttbeg et al.•American Journal of Political…•1975

  • Ideological Distance between Candidates

    John L Sullivan, Daniel Richard Minns•American Journal of Political…•1976

  • Party Dynamics in the 1980s

    James L Gibson, John P Frendreis et al.•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model

    Randall L Calvert•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Heterogeneity and Representation

    Michael A Bailey, Michael Bailey et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior

    Robert S Erikson•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Whither the Local Parties

    James L Gibson, Cornelius P Cotter et al.•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • PACs and the Congressional Supermarket

    Janet Grenzke, Janet M Grenzke•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Representation in the American National Conventions

    Open Access•Jeane J Kirkpatrick, Jeane Kirkpatrick•British Journal of Political…•1975

  • Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers

    Open Access•Herbert Mcclosky, Paul J Hoffmann et al.•American Political Science Review•1960

  • A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism

    Open Access•John H Aldrich•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Electoral Competition with Informed and Uninformed Voters

    Open Access•David P Baron•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Party Effort and Its Impact on the Vote

    Open Access•William J Crotty•American Political Science Review•1971

  • An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process

    Open Access•Otto A Davis, Melvin J Hinich et al.•American Political Science Review•1970

  • Political Processes and Public Expenditures

    Open Access•R Kenneth Godwin, W Bruce Shepard•American Political Science Review•1976

  • Buying Time

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Consensus and Ideology in American Politics

    Open Access•Herbert Mcclosky•American Political Science Review•1964

  • An Information Rationale for the Power of Special Interests

    Open Access•Susanne Lohmann•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Public Goods, Private Interests, and Representation

    Open Access•J E Jackson, David C King•American Political Science Review•1989

  • The Electoral Relevance of Local Party Organizations

    Open Access•John P Frendreis, James L Gibson et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,41
Citation span2004 - 2020 (17)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae