Senate Incumbent Visibility over the Election Cycle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6300613 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles H Franklin (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1993 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 271 |
| Publication date | 1993-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Legislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/439994 |
| OpenAlex | W2321540133 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 2 |
Candidate visibility has become a key variable in the study of congressional elections. There is ample evidence that visibility is a substantial advantage, one which almost always favors incumbents. In this paper I trace the visibility of members of the U.S. Senate between their bids for reelection and over their political careers. I find that there is a moderate drop off of visibility near the midpoint of a Senate term, and a fairly sizable rise in prominence in the two years leading up to a reelection bid. Yet, even in the middle of the term, incumbent senators remain quite salient in the minds of the public. Over an entire career, visibility cumulates for some perceptions and does not cumulate much for others. This differential accretion of visibility may have important consequences. Finally, I argue for the need to study perceptions of incumbents outside of the election period. The time of governing is at the center of a republican society, yet we have few studies of how governing is linked to public perceptions of incumbents
Geography · Political science · Visibility · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Media and Politics
Elections, competition, and constituent evaluations of U.S. senators
The Incidence and Timing of PAC Contributions to Incumbent U.S. House Members, 1993-94
Different Houses
Beyond the Demand-Input Model
Red Scare? Revisiting Joe McCarthy’s Influence on 1950s Elections
Constituent Approval and Presidential Support
Separate and Unequal Effects
What's Newt Doing in People Magazine?” The Changing Effect of National Prominence in Congressional Elections
A Dynamic Model of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections
Issue Accountability and the Mass Public
Examining Legislative Cue‐Taking in the US Senate
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,37 |
| Citation span | 1996 - 2022 (27) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |