Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Senate Incumbent Visibility over the Election Cycle

Bibliographic Data

ID6300613
AuthorsCharles H Franklin (corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume18
Issue2
Pages271
Publication date1993-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/439994
OpenAlexW2321540133
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited2

Candidate visibility has become a key variable in the study of congressional elections. There is ample evidence that visibility is a substantial advantage, one which almost always favors incumbents. In this paper I trace the visibility of members of the U.S. Senate between their bids for reelection and over their political careers. I find that there is a moderate drop off of visibility near the midpoint of a Senate term, and a fairly sizable rise in prominence in the two years leading up to a reelection bid. Yet, even in the middle of the term, incumbent senators remain quite salient in the minds of the public. Over an entire career, visibility cumulates for some perceptions and does not cumulate much for others. This differential accretion of visibility may have important consequences. Finally, I argue for the need to study perceptions of incumbents outside of the election period. The time of governing is at the center of a republican society, yet we have few studies of how governing is linked to public perceptions of incumbents

Geography · Political science · Visibility · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Media and Politics

  • Elections, competition, and constituent evaluations of U.S. senators

    Open Access•James Sievert, Ryan D Williamson•Electoral Studies•2022

  • The Incidence and Timing of PAC Contributions to Incumbent U.S. House Members, 1993-94

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Peter M Radcliffe et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Different Houses

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus, Amy Steigerwalt•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Beyond the Demand-Input Model

    Patricia A Hurley, Kim Quaile Hill et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Red Scare? Revisiting Joe McCarthy’s Influence on 1950s Elections

    Adam J Berinsky, Gabriel S Lenz•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Constituent Approval and Presidential Support

    Open Access•Jeffrey E Cohen, Brandon Rottinghaus•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Separate and Unequal Effects

    Open Access•Daniel Stevens•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • What's Newt Doing in People Magazine?” The Changing Effect of National Prominence in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•David Niven, Jeremy Zilber•Political Behavior•1998

  • A Dynamic Model of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Tse-Min Lin•Political Analysis•1996

  • Issue Accountability and the Mass Public

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, Brandice Canes‐wrone et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Examining Legislative Cue‐Taking in the US Senate

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Janet Box‐steffensmeier et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Congressmen's Voting Decisions

    John W Kingdon, John Kingdon•Congressmen's voting decisions•1989

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,37
Citation span1996 - 2022 (27)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae