Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Candidates, Issues, and Participation in Senate Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID6300749
AuthorsLyn Ragsdale, Jerrold G Rusk
Year1995
Volume20
Issue3
Pages305
Publication date1995-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/440223
OpenAlexW2335251731
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited20

The study provides the first thorough empirical examination of how individuals' knowledge of and opinions about the candidates and issues of a campaign affect participation. The study proposes a campaign attention model in which people assess whether there is someone for whom to vote before deciding whether to vote. More specifically, the model posits three candidate-based conditions for participation: knowledge, distinctiveness, and preference. First, individuals who have knowledge of the candidates or issues are more likely to vote than those who do not. Second, individuals who perceive the candidates as distinct from one another are more likely to vote than others. Third, individuals who judge at least one candidate favorably are more likely to vote than those who do not. The model is tested in previously unstudied Senate elections. The results of a probit analysis for the 1990 midterm Senate races indicate the importance of the campaign attention model. Individuals' issue awareness, issue preferences, candidate recognition, perceived candidate differences, and candidate preferences significantly affect individuals' decisions to go to the polls, controlling for the effects of their demographic characteristics, political involvement, and the electoral context

Political science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Media Studies and Communication · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • The Efficacy of Inoculation in Televised Political Debates

    Open Access•Chasu An, Michael Pfau•Journal of Communication•2004

  • Issue-Advocacy versus Candidate Advertising

    Open Access•Michael Pfau, R L Holbert et al.•Journal of Communication•2002

  • Structural Antecedents to Knowledge and Participation

    Open Access•Jaeho Cho, Douglas M Mcleod•Journal of Communication•2007

  • Candidate Preference, State Context, and Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Vladimir E Medenica, Matthew Fowler•The Forum•2021

  • Voter response to congressional campaigns

    Open Access•Scott J Basinger, Scott Basinger et al.•Public Choice•2012

  • Explaining Gender Differences in Turnout Using Panel Data Across Elections

    Open Access•H Coffe, Ignacio Lago Peñas•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • Red Scare? Revisiting Joe McCarthy’s Influence on 1950s Elections

    Adam J Berinsky, Gabriel S Lenz•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Partisan Turnout Bias in Midterm Legislative Elections

    Open Access•Martin P Wattenberg, Martin Wattenberg et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2002

  • US Senate campaigns, negative advertising, and voter mobilization in the 1998 midterm election

    Open Access•Robert A Jackson, Robert Jackson et al.•Electoral Studies•2007

  • Negative campaigns, interpersonal trust, and prosocial behavior

    Open Access•Nicu Haas, Nicholas Haas et al.•Electoral Studies•2020

  • The Effects of Party- and PAC-Sponsored Issue Advertising and the Potential of Inoculation to Combat its Impact on the Democratic Process

    Open Access•Michael Pfau, David Park et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2001

  • Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin Kahn, Patrick J Kenney•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Senate Elections in the News

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin Kahn•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1991

  • A Multivariate Explanation of Decreasing Turnout in Presidential Elections, 1960-1976

    Stephen D Shaffer•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • Race-Related Differences in Self-Reported and Validated Turnout

    Paul R Abramson, William Claggett•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Race-Related Differences in Self-Reported and Validated Turnout in 1984

    Paul R Abramson, William Claggett•The Journal of Politics•1986

  • The Mobilization of Voters in Congressional Elections

    Gregory A Caldeira, Samuel C Patterson et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • The Consequences of Validated and Self-Reported Voting Measures

    John P Katosh, Michael W Traugott•Public Opinion Quarterly•1981

  • Voter turnout and candidate choice

    Open Access•Jesse F Marquette, Katherine A Hinckley•Political Behavior•1988

  • Turnout in recent American presidential elections

    Open Access•Carole Jean Uhlaner•Political Behavior•1989

  • Explaining Primary Turnout

    Open Access•Patrick J Kenney•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1986

  • Beyond Willie Horton and the Pledge of Allegiance

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Jeffrey A Segal•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Who Are Nonvoters? Profiles from the 1990 Senate Elections

    Lyn Ragsdale, Jerrold G Rusk•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • Voting and Nonvoting

    Lee Sigelman, Philip W Roeder et al.•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Economic Adversity and Voter Turnout

    Steven J Rosenstone•American Journal of Political…•1982

  • Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Peverill Squire, Raymond E Wolfinger et al.•American Political Science Review•1987

  • Perceived Representativess and Voting

    Open Access•John F Zipp•American Political Science Review•1985

  • An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process

    Open Access•Otto A Davis, Melvin J Hinich et al.•American Political Science Review•1970

  • The Theory of Party Equilibrium

    Open Access•Gerald Garvey•American Political Science Review•1966

  • Getting Out the Vote

    Open Access•Samuel C Patterson, Gregory A Caldeira•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Registration and Voting

    Open Access•Stanley Kelley, Richard E Ayres et al.•American Political Science Review•1967

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,44
Citation span1999 - 2021 (23)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae