Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Strategic Voting in Multi‐Office Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID6300803
AuthorsMichael Peres (0000-0002-6732-0733, University of Rochester, corresponding author), Michael Peress
Year2008
Volume33
Issue4
Pages619-642
Publication date2008-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3162/036298008786403060
OpenAlexW2091938132
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited31

What are the incentives for voters to vote strategically when legislative policy outcomes are constrained by a system of checks and balances? The policy‐balancing theory supposes that moderate voters split their tickets because such splitting is the only way these voters can achieve moderate policy outcomes. I show that a different type of strategic voting, policy stacking, is characteristic of legislatures that endow the majority party with only limited institutional powers. Focusing on voting for the president and House of Representatives in the United States reveals that a substantial proportion of voters engage in policy‐stacking behavior, but very few engage in policy‐balancing behavior

Business · Economics · Incentive · Legislature · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • The Electoral Costs of Party Agenda Setting

    Jesse Richman•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Estimating the persuasive effects of advertising in presidential primary elections

    Open Access•Robert Bird, Robert C Bird et al.•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy

    Open Access•Alberto Alesina, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Partisan Politics, Divided…•1995

  • A Unified Theory of Party Competition

    Open Access•James Adams, James F Adams et al.•Unified Theory of Party Competition•2005

  • A Theory of Divided Government

    Alberto Alesina, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Econometrica•1996

  • Gatekeeping and Monopoly Power of Committees

    Arthur T Denzau, Robert J Mackay•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • A simple direction model of electoral competition

    Open Access•Steven A Matthews•Public Choice•1979

  • The Puzzle of Midterm Loss

    Robert S Erikson•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • Split-Ticket Voting

    Open Access•Michael S Lewis-Beck, Richard Nadeau•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Optimal Supermajority Requirements in a Two-Party System

    Michael Peres, Michael Peress•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Split-Ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina's Policy-Balancing Model

    Open Access•Richard Born, Richard T Born•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1994

  • Who Wins? Party Effects in Legislative Voting

    Open Access•Eric D Lawrence, Eric Lawrence et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Institutional and Partisan Sources of Gridlock

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1996

  • Comparing Strategic Voting Under FPTP and PR

    Open Access•Paul R Abramson, John H Aldrich et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2010

  • Downsian Voting and the Separation of Powers

    Dean Lacy, Philip Paolino•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Strategic Voting in Britain

    Bruce E Cain•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government

    Lee Sigelman, Paul J Wahlbeck et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study

    John R Petrocik•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • The Multicandidate Calculus of Voting

    Jerome H Black•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, Jonathan Nagler•British Journal of Political…•2000

  • "Sophisticated" Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries

    Open Access•Paul R Abramson, John H Aldrich et al.•American Political Science Review•1992

  • Coordination, Moderation, and Institutional Balancing in American Presidential and House Elections

    Open Access•Walter R Mebane•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Ideological Consensus Within Divided Party Government

    Open Access•Paul Frymer•Political Science Quarterly•1994

  • Measuring strategic voting

    Open Access•André Blais, Richard Nadeau•Electoral Studies•1996

  • Loss aversion, presidential responsibility, and midterm congressional elections

    Open Access•John W Patty•Electoral Studies•2006

  • Stability and Coordination in Duverger's Law

    Open Access•Mark Fey•American Political Science Review•1997

  • A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting

    Open Access•Barry C Burden, Barry Burden et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Coordination and Policy Moderation at Midterm

    Open Access•Walter R Mebane, Jasjeet S Sekhon•American Political Science Review•2002

  • When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties

    Open Access•Orit Kedar•American Political Science Review•2005

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,18
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae