The Role of Investigative Committees in the Presidential Impeachment Processes in Brazil and Colombia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6300890 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Naoko Kada (International Community Foundation, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-54 |
| Publication date | 2003-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Legislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3162/036298003x200791 |
| OpenAlex | W2091794059 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 14 |
One of the most important political debates today regards how to design institutions to ensure the accountability of public officials. The impeachment process is one mechanism of accountability check available to legislatures. It is, however, susceptible to misuse. What determines how the impeachment process functions? In this paper, I argue that control of information by congressional investigation committees is a crucial factor in deciding the outcome of the impeachment process. I show how the difference in information control by the investigative committees in Brazil and Colombia contributed to the removal of a president in one country and a president's acquittal in the other
Accountability · Acquittal · Control (management · Economics · Impeachment · Legislative process · Legislature · Management · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Process (computing · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Politics and Society in Latin America · Public Administration
Presidents and Assemblies
Information and Legislative Organization
The Federalist
Building democratic institutions
Patterns of democracy
Minority government and majority rule
Political Parties
Democracy, Accountability, and Representation
Collor, Corruption and Crisis
The Rise and Fall of President Collar and its Impact on Brazilian Democracy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,21 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2019 (13) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |