Assessing the President's Role as Party Agent in Congressional Elections

The Case of Bill Clinton in 2000

Bibliographic Data

ID6300928
AuthorsGary C Jacobson (0000-0001-6392-839X, University of California San Diego), Samuel Kernell (University of California San Diego), Jeffrey Lazarus (0000-0003-1707-1318, University of California San Diego)
Year2004
Volume29
Issue2
Pages159-184
Publication date2004-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3162/036298004x201131
OpenAlexW2080649188
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited9

Presidents have become their parties' chief fund‐raisers and thus have the capacity to further their parties' collective fortunes by imposing a more efficient distribution of campaign resources than might otherwise prevail. In order to succeed, presidents must, first, accurately target their efforts where they will best improve candidates' prospects for winning seats, and second, either directly or indirectly (through signaling to other donors) generate sufficient new resources to affect the election outcome. Analyses of Bill Clinton's extensive fund‐raising efforts during the 1999–2000 election cycle confirm that presidents can indeed use their unmatched fund‐raising ability to help their parties win congressional contests they might otherwise lose. But analysis of the Clinton record also shows that presidential fund‐raising activities may be shaped by other purposes that lead to a distribution of effort that is suboptimal for the party

Business · Distribution (mathematics · Fund raising · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Raising (metalworking · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Law · Public Administration · Finance

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub