Effects of Increased Transparency on Political Divides and MP Behavior
Evidence from Televised Question Hours in the Finnish Parliament
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6301148 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeremias Nieminen (0000-0002-3704-7000, University of Turku), Salla Simola (Storytel), Janne Tukiainen (0000-0003-2534-657X, University of Turku, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 585-616 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Legislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/lsq.12439 |
| OpenAlex | W4387450739 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 39 |
We study the effects of increasing the transparency of parliamentary speeches on polarization and other types of MP behavior. We utilize the 1989 introduction of TV broadcasting to the Finnish government's parliamentary question hours held on the first Thursday of every month. By contrast, the question hours held on other Thursdays of the month were not televised until 2007, allowing us to use a difference‐in‐differences design. We find a positive effect on government–opposition divides, but no evidence that the TV broadcasting of question hours would affect left–right polarization, differences between individual parties, or within‐party group differences. We also observe an increase in attendance and a negative effect on the number of speeches, but no effects on topics discussed, speech length or interruptions. Our results suggest there is no trade‐off between increased transparency and left–right polarization. However, the presence of TV cameras can fuel other political divides and increase politicians’ effort
Advertising · Attendance · Business · Economics · General election · Opposition (politics · Parliament · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Transparency (behavior · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Party systems and voter alignments
Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices
The Wrong Kind of Transparency
An economic theory of democracy
Legislators in the crossfire
The “Mainstreaming” of America
Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure
The Fox News Effect
Bias in Cable News
The role of (social) media in political polarization
The Gender Cleavage
Incumbent performance and electoral control
Has Legislative Television Changed Legislator Behavior
Press Coverage and Political Accountability
Framing Persuasive Appeals
Polarization and Publicity
Group Identities and Parliamentary Debates
Elections and Divisiveness
Estimating Intra-Party Preferences
Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock
Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-making in the SwedishRiksdag
Classification Accuracy as a Substantive Quantity of Interest
Politics of Constituency Representation and Legislative Ambition under the Glare of Camera Lights
The personal vote and party cohesion
United we stand, divided we rule
Electoral Accountability
Media and Political Polarization
Emotion and Politics
Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech
What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat
Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies
Incentives to cultivate a personal vote
Playing to the Gallery
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |