Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6301860 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jacob Brix (0000-0003-0389-9114, Aalborg University), Hanne Kathrine Krogstrup (Aalborg University), Nanna Moeller Mortensen (Aalborg University), Nanna Møller Mortensen (0000-0002-6396-8401, Aalborg University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 169-185 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Local Government Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0300-3930 • E-ISSN: 1743-9388 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03003930.2019.1702530 |
| OpenAlex | W2992619015 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 34 |
| References cited | 54 |
New Public Governance assumes that co-production leads to beneficial outcomes, such as increased efficiency and better citizen well-being. However, few empirical studies have documented these outcomes, and some have demonstrated that the assumed outcomes do not emerge. This study establishes that co-production is a complex, social phenomenon, which implies that there cannot be a clear cause-effect relationship between co-production activities and their outcomes. To qualify and enable further empirical investigation of the outcomes of co-production, the study proposes that contribution analysis should be applied as an appropriate evaluation paradigm to theoretically reduce complexity and define a generic programme theory for co-production. The study also discusses how the creation and operationalisation of a local co-production programme theory can take place to evaluate the relationship between co-production initiatives and outcomes on a localised level. Finally, directions are provided for how the outcomes of co-production can be co-evaluated with citizens
Business · Economics · Government (linguistics · Local government · Macroeconomics · Political science · Production (economics · Community Development and Social Impact · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Philosophy · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
From Registration to Activation
Traditional authorities and co-production in community development in northern Ghana
Institutional environment and passive co-production
Conditions for involving vulnerable citizens in co-production
Understanding co-production with vulnerable populations
Expectations versus reality
Explaining patterns of co-creation in Swiss local governance
Mainstreaming Co-production
‘I do not want to be one of her favourites’. Emotional display and the co-production of frontline care services
Municipal strategies and local impacts of place-based co-production
Evaluating corporate-startup collaboration
Planning and managing for resilient natural resources and communities in the USA
How does co-produced research influence adaptive capacity? Lessons from a cross-case comparison
Co‐Designing Local Collaboration Between Social Services, Primary Healthcare, and the Third Sector—A Realist Process Evaluation
Nothing about us without us
Public values? A systematic literature review into the outcomes of public service co-creation
The split ladder of participation
Addressing loneliness and social isolation amongst elderly people through local co‐production in Japan
Gender-based violence policy reform
Advancing co-production for transformative change by synthesizing guidance from case studies on the sustainable management and governance of natural resources
Embedding co-production of nature-based solutions in urban governance
Local factors sustaining co-production
Collective action and co‐production of public services as alternative politics
Co-creation
Agonistic pluralism for enhancing the co-design of agri-environmental policy
How personnel allocation affects performance
New frontiers in local government community engagement
Ecologies of co-production in the Anthropocene
I Know I Am Not Supposed to, but I Just Want Them to Feel Cozy
Co-production on the inside’ – public professionals negotiating interaction between municipal actors and local citizens
Shall we tango? Exploring the drivers of co-production in US local governments
Citizen engagement in coproductive community services
Exploring relationships between coproduction and service user outcomes
Wider institutional research cultures and their influence on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research - An institutional ethnography
Empowerment Evaluation
Co-Production and Co-Creation
Evidence-based Policy
Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production
Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production
Autonomy and Control of State Agencies
Fourth-Generation Evaluation
Generating ‘good enough’ evidenc for co-production
Realising the Potential of Co-production
The split ladder of participation
Towards a Paradigm of Democratic Participation
Evidence, Understanding and Complexity
Four Waves of Evaluation Diffusion
Linking theory-based evaluation and contribution analysis
User Participation in Quality Assessment
Experiential Science; Towards an Integration of Implicit and Reflected Practitioner-Expert Knowledge in the Scientific Development of Organic Farming
Theory-Based Evaluation Meets Ambiguity
Introducing Evidence-Based Principles to Guide Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation
From Engagement to Co-production
Urban Transport
A Model of Cost‐cutting in Government? The Great Management Revolution in Uk Central Government Reconsidered
The ‘New Public Governance’ and Employability Services in an Era of Crisis
Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction
Varieties of Participation in Public Services
The Public Service Production Process
Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services
Co-producing safety in the local community
Collaborative Governance of Ageing
Divergence in Community Participation Policy
Initiated Distrust
New Public Management
Beyond Engagement and Participation
Crossing the great divide
| Unique citing works | 34 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 34 |