Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Participatory Budgeting and Community-Based Research

Principles, Practices, and Implications for Impact Validity

Bibliographic Data

ID6308589
AuthorsAlexa Kasdan (Urban Justice Center Community Development Project, New York, NY, USA), Erin Markman (Urban Justice Center Community Development Project, New York, NY, USA, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume39
Issue1
Pages143-155
Publication date2017-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0739-3148 • E-ISSN: 1469-9931
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1080/07393148.2017.1278859
OpenAlexW2589129867
LanguageEN
Citations received6

Research and evaluation is an integral part of the Participatory Budgeting (PB) process. Since PB in New York City (PBNYC) is designed to be a democratic and community-based initiative that is grounded in the values of equity and inclusion, it is important that the research and evaluation methods used to study the process and its participants adhere to the same principles. For the past five years, a team of community-based researchers, academics, and PB participants have designed research questions and instruments, implemented data collection, analyzed and shared data with PB participants and practitioners, and issued reports to the wider public. Like PB, the research design is rooted in the communities where PB is operating. The research is not intended to sit on a shelf but is actively used by participants and practitioners to help reflect on the process, improve deliberation in decision-making, and strengthen the process and outcomes of PB. This article will discuss Participatory Action Research principles used by the Community Development Project of the Urban Justice Center, explore the applicability of these principles to the Participatory Budgeting research context, and explain how these practices have helped to deepen and improve the process and outcomes of PBNYC

Action research · Citizen journalism · Community-based participatory research · Context (archaeology · Data collection · Deliberation · Democracy · Equity (law · Inclusion (mineral · Participatory action research · Participatory budgeting · Participatory evaluation · Pedagogy · Political science · Process (computing · Public participation · Public relations · Research design · Social science · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • From Transportation Equity to Transportation Justice

    Open Access•Alex Karner, Jonathan K London et al.•Journal of Planning Literature•2020

  • Participatory Budgeting

    Open Access•Carolin Hagelskamp, David Schleifer et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2018

  • Is Collaborative, Community-Engaged Scholarship More Rigorous Than Traditional Scholarship? On Advocacy, Bias, and Social Science Research

    Open Access•Mark R Warren, José Calderón et al.•Urban Education•2018

  • Who is Interested in Participating in Participatory Budgeting

    Open Access•David Doherty, Raluca G Pavel et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2024

  • Participatory democracy and participatory research

    Open Access•Hans Asenbaum, Sonia Bussu et al.•European Political Science Review•2025

  • The Dynamics of Local Participation

    Open Access•Karen A Callaghan, Roger Horne•American Behavioral Scientist•2023

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae