Democratic Audit
Good Governance, Human Rights, War against Terror
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6310316 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Blick (0000-0001-9527-1978, University of Essex), Iain Byrne (University of Essex), Stuart Weir (University of Essex) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 408-423 |
| Publication date | 2005-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Parliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pa/gsi031 |
| OpenAlex | W2135544624 |
| Language | EN |
Major constitutional changes from the 1980s onwards have not generally been informed by a vision of good governance, constitutionality or democratic principle. The Labour government’s reform programme since 1997 has retained central powers on which ‘elective dictatorship’ or Jack Straw’s ‘executive democracy’ depends. This article surveys the largely unconstrained use of these powers in 2003, in particular the Prime Minister’s decision to commit the UK to the invasion of Iraq. The article questions the legality of this decision, and the means of announcing it; points up the weakness of Parliament; expresses concerns about the central and unaccountable role of special advisers in No.10 Downing Street. It also examines the limited effects of the Human Rights Act, surveys the Home Secretary’s post-9/11 challenge to civil and political rights in the UK, considers the difficulties of protecting asylum-seekers from destitution, and reports on the proportionality and pluralism of the May devolved elections
Civil liberties · Constitution · Constitutionality · Corporate governance · Democracy · Economics · Good governance · Human rights · Opposition (politics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Principle of legality · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |