Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How to Deal with Executive Secrecy? Opposition Perspectives and Practices in the German Bundestag

Bibliographic Data

ID6310372
AuthorsDorothee Riese (0000-0002-4623-6858, Institut für Politikwissenschaft, FernUniversität Hagen , Hagen, Germany, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume76
Issue3
Pages600-620
Publication date2023-06-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pa/gsab065
OpenAlexW4205284868
LanguageEN
References cited18

Opposition parties in parliamentary democracies act as controllers of the executive. Consequently, executive secrecy should be a pressing issue as it deprives them of information for public scrutiny. This article investigates how parliamentary opposition parties and individual politicians discuss executive secrecy using the example of the German Bundestag. Given disagreement about secrecy’s legitimacy, especially in actual political practice, the article systematises opposition strategies. The analysis reveals two distinct ones: active cooperation strategies, where opposition parties cooperate with the governing majority to legally define secrecy’s framework and oversight, and passive coping strategies where MPs develop scrutiny practices that function despite secrecy

German · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Scrutiny · Secrecy · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Populism, Right-Wing Movements

  • Die Macht der Parlamente

    Open Access•Martin Sebaldt•Die Macht der Parlamente•2009

  • Publicity's Secret

    Jodi Dean•Publicity's Secret•2002

  • Das Geheimnis

    Open Access•Joachim Westerbarkey•Geheimnis•1991

  • Grenzen der Transparenz – Geheimhaltung in demokratischen Systemen

    Open Access•Dorothee Riese•Der Transparenz-Imperativ•2019

  • Secrecy in Europe

    Open Access•Berthold Rittberger, Klaus H Goetz•West European Politics•2018

  • If you can beat them, confront them

    Open Access•Or Tuttnauer•European Union Politics•2018

  • National Parliamentary Scrutiny Over EU Issues

    Open Access•Ronald Holzhacker•European Union Politics•2002

  • Contestation and co-optation

    Guri Rosén•West European Politics•2018

  • Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures

    Open Access•Simon Hix, Abdul Noury•Political Science Research and…•2016

  • Reaching across the aisle

    Open Access•Tom Louwerse, Simon Otje et al.•Party Politics•2017

  • People's Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reasons for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament

    Stefanie Bailer•Journal of Legislative Studies•2011

  • Five Ways of Institutionalizing Political Opposition

    Open Access•Ludger Helms•Government and Opposition•2004

  • Legislative agenda‐setting in parliamentary democracies

    Open Access•Thomas Bräuninger, Marc Debus•European Journal of Political…•2009

  • Bringing Secrecy into the Open

    Open Access•Jana Costas, Christopher Grey•Organization Studies•2014

  • State Secrets and Executive Power

    Open Access•William G Weaver, Robert M Pallitto et al.•Political Science Quarterly•2005

  • Democratic Secrecy

    Open Access•D F Thompson•Political Science Quarterly•1999

  • The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies

    Georg Simmel•American Journal of Sociology•1906

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae