It’s Politics, Stupid!’ The Spanish General Election of 20041
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6311337 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Georgina Blakeley (0000-0003-1532-0704, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 331-349 |
| Publication date | 2006-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Parliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pa/gsl001 |
| OpenAlex | W2160730216 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
THE Spanish general election of 14 March 2004, which took place only three days after the Madrid bombings on the 11 March, produced a change of government that opinion surveys had not predicted. It is easy to assume, therefore, that the change of government from the right-wing Popular Party (PP), which had governed Spain for the previous eight years, to the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) was a direct result of the terrorist bombings which left 192 dead and over 1,500 injured. While the terrorist bombings undoubtedly influenced the general election, this article argues that a more detailed reading of the last four years of the Spanish political context shows that the change of government was not simply a result of the ‘four days that changed Spain’.2 The Madrid bombings acted as a catalyst for change, but the desire for change had built up gradually, following the PP’s second electoral victory in 2000, particularly amongst a key sector of the electorate, namely, that sector which places itself ideologically closer to the PSOE than to other parties, but which in the election of 2000 either chose to switch their vote to the PP or to abstain.3As the ruling party at the time of the bombings, the PP’s conduct is the main focus of this article. One of the conclusions, however, is that the PP’s conduct cannot solely be dismissed as an aberration peculiar to the PP itself; on the contrary, such a style of governing is, at least in part, systemic. Key features of Spain’s political architecture, designed in the early years of the transition to democracy, aimed at consolidating executive power and avoiding the fragmentation and political instability characteristic of Spain’s ill-fated Second Republic (1931–36). Constitutional design aimed at consolidating executive power, however, does not translate easily into constitutional design aimed at constraining executive power when absolute majority governments occur
General election · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Political Systems and Governance
Mass Polarization Across Time and Space
The Madrid bombings and popular protest
Does Terrorism Ever Work? The 2004 Madrid Train Bombings
Have you seen Bloomberg
Mobilizations against the Iraq War in Spain
Evaluating Spain's Reparation Law
The Political Effectiveness of Terrorism Revisited
Debunking Spontaneity
Vote evolution in Spain, 1977-2007
How Spain's International Status Was Enhanced After the Withdrawal of Its Troops From Iraq
A magnificent atmosphere? Romanian immigration in the political debate of Madrid, Spain
| Citations per year | 0.58 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2007 - 2025 (19) |
| Highly cited | No |