Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mapping Mutations in Legislation

A Bioinformatics Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID6311482
AuthorsRuth Dixon (0000-0002-2177-609X, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Ruth M Dixon (University of Oxford), Jonathan A Jones (0000-0003-1862-587X, University of Oxford)
Year2019
Volume72
Issue1
Pages21-41
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pa/gsy006
OpenAlexW2789766818
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited30

Legislative amendment poses a conundrum: why do governments amend legislation that they only recently drafted? An effective method for quantifying amendments across a wide range of policy areas and legislatures would be valuable for answering such questions. Existing studies almost all rely on hand-counting and coding of amendments, methods which are laborious, necessarily subjective, and difficult to replicate. Using insights from bioinformatics (the study of genetic codes), we developed a streamlined method to quantify and visualise the amount of amendment. In an exploratory study of three parliamentary sessions since 2008, we found that UK legislation was considerably amended and lengthened during the parliamentary process. We discuss our results in the light of theories of information asymmetries between the government and the legislature

Coding (social sciences · Government (linguistics · Legislation · Legislative process · Legislature · Political science · Replicate · Social science · Sociology · Statistics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

  • Constructive and Destructive Legislative Review

    Lion Behrens, Dominic Nyhuis et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • In the cradle of laws

    Open Access•Jakub Lysek, Robert Zbiral•Journal of Public Policy•2022

  • To amend or not to amend

    Anna M Palau, Andreu Casas et al.•West European Politics•2023

  • Perpetual scrutiny? Mutual control among coalition political parties in the executive and parliamentary phases of law-making

    Open Access•Robert Zbiral, Jakub Lysek et al.•Party Politics•2023

  • A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?

    Christopher Hood, Ruth Dixon•Government That Worked Better and…•2015

  • Parliaments and Coalitions

    Leonard W Martins, Lanny W Martin et al.•Parliaments and coalitions•2011

  • Information and Legislative Organization

    Keith Krehbiel•Information and Legislative…•1991

  • DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors

    Open Access•Frederick Sanger, S Nicklen et al.•Proceedings of the National…•1977

  • Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrial Countries

    Open Access•Nouriel Roubini, Jeff Sachs et al.•Economic Policy•1989

  • Models of Man

    Open Access•Martin Hollis•Models of Man•1977

  • Indeterminate sovereignty and the rule of law

    Open Access•Matthew L Williams•British Politics•2015

  • Mind the Gap

    Open Access•Matthew Flinders, Alexandra Kelso•The British Journal of Politics…•2011

  • In the Brown Stuff

    Patrick Cowley, Mark Stuart•Contemporary British History•2014

  • The Civil Servant as Legislator

    Open Access•Edward C Page•Public Administration•2003

  • What Affects the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of EP Amendments

    Open Access•Amie Kreppel•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•1999

  • Legislative Procedures in the European Union

    Open Access•George Tsebelis, Christian B Jensen et al.•British Journal of Political…•2001

  • Debunking the Myths of Bill Committees in the British House of Commons

    Open Access•Louise Thompson•Politics•2016

  • The Impact of the Scottish Parliament in Amending Executive Legislation

    Open Access•Mark Shephard, Paul Cairney•Political Studies•2005

  • Public Bill Committees

    J Levy•Parliamentary Affairs•2010

  • Does the Executive Dominate the Westminster Legislative Process

    Meg Russell, Daniel Gover et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2016

  • Making a Difference? The Effectiveness of Pre-Legislative Scrutiny

    Jennifer Smookler•Parliamentary Affairs•2006

  • Horses and hippos

    Open Access•Andrea Pedrazzani, Francesco Zucchini•European Journal of Political…•2013

  • Explaining Instability in the Stability and Growth Pact

    Open Access•Nicole Rae Baerg, Mark Hallerberg•Comparative Political Studies•2016

  • Parliamentary Scrutiny of Rights in the United Kingdom

    Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•Australian Journal of Political…•2009

  • Parties and Policymaking in Multiparty Governments

    Open Access•Leonard W Martins, Lanny W Martins et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • The Policy Power of the Westminster Parliament

    Open Access•Meg Russell, Patrick Cowley•Governance•2015

  • Does parliament matter

    Open Access•Michael Winter•Journal of Rural Studies•1994

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2023 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae