Between Diversity, Representation and ‘Best Evidence
Rethinking Select Committee Evidence-Gathering Practices
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6311554 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Danielle Beswick (0000-0003-0345-9039, University of Birmingham), Stephen Elstub (0000-0002-4382-5593, Newcastle University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 945-964 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Parliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pa/gsz035 |
| OpenAlex | W2973214722 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 16 |
Select committees play an important role in scrutinising government policy. They have come under increasing pressure to seek evidence for their inquiries—including both formal and informal evidence—from a wider range of stakeholders. Two particular pressures can be observed within this trend. First, committees are expected to show commitment to hearing from a more diverse set of stakeholders. The second pressure relates to the representativeness of those providing evidence. Consequently, they have been urged to increase public engagement. The recent Citizens’ Assembly into adult social care points to one mechanism for engaging a ‘mini-public’ in committee inquiries. Due to their use of random and stratified sampling to recruit participants, mini-publics could diversify the evidence base and facilitate public scrutiny of the committees. However, we know little of what committee members and staffs think about these issues. In this article, we draw insights from over 60 interviews with select committee chairs, members and staff to gain insight into their perspectives on evidence diversity and the potential of mini-publics to promote this. We find that traditional approaches to inquiries are still favoured. While mini-publics are seen as a solution to the failings of current approaches to public engagement, this is for instrumental reasons, meaning that they are only valued in particular circumstances. Ultimately, further culture change is required if committee inquiries are to move substantially beyond the traditional approach
Diversity (politics · Evidence-based policy · Government (linguistics · Meaning (existential · Political science · Public relations · Publics · Representation (politics · Representativeness heuristic · Scrutiny · Sociology · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology
Building trust with digital democratic innovations
How Politicians Understand Deliberation
Who speaks for whom? Gendered representation in interest group advocacy before parliament
Right to a Referendum, or Duty to Deliberate? Rethinking Normative Entitlements to Secession
Legislative science advice in Chile
Democratic Innovation in the Scottish Parliament
The webs of belief around ‘evidence’ in legislatures
Which mini-publics do they favour? A European experiment on Politicians’ attitudes towards mini-publics’ design
Mini-publics and policy impact analysis
Enhancing the Scrutiny Role of Select Committees
House of Commons Public Bill Committees and Oral Evidence
Diverse roles and perceptions of public officials and NGOs in local citizens’ assemblies – A comparative analysis of the cases of Poland and Hungary
UK parliamentary select committees
Is this a men’s world? On the need to study descriptive representation of women in lobbying and policy advocacy
The minipublic bubble
Public opinion towards interest groups
Institutionalising participatory and deliberative procedures
(Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making
Why Do Politicians Not Act Upon Citizens’ Deliberations? Evidence From Iceland
Democratic Innovations
Democracy and Expertise
Deliberative Democracy
Participation and Democratic Theory
Going to Extremes
The Pursuit of Legitimacy as a Key Driver for Public Engagement
The Possibility of Critical Mini-Publics
Political Leaders and Public Engagement
Committee Hearings of the UK Parliament
Select Committees in the House of Commons and the Media
Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies
Parliaments' Endless Pursuit of Trust
From ‘Opening Up’ to Democratic Renewal
Coupling citizens and elites in deliberative systems
Connecting deliberative mini‐publics to representative decision making
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |