Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Prorogation

Comparative Context and Scope for Reform

Bibliographic Data

ID6311985
AuthorsThomas G Fleming (0000-0002-6241-5100, University of Oxford), Petra Schleiter (0000-0002-1150-0954, University of Oxford, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume74
Issue4
Pages964-978
Publication date2021-09-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pa/gsaa017
OpenAlexW3082103364
LanguageEN
References cited19

In August 2019, the UK government’s attempt to prorogue parliament for five weeks raised the question whether the UK’s prorogation rules ought to be reformed. We place this discussion in comparative perspective by contrasting the UK’s prorogation rules with (i) equivalent procedures in 26 European democracies and (ii) recent changes in other areas of UK executive–legislative relations. These comparisons suggest that the UK’s current prorogation rules are increasingly anomalous. They give governments significantly more power to suspend parliament than comparable European democracies, and are at variance with recent efforts to counterbalance the executive’s wide ranging discretion in the UK

Context (archaeology · Discretion · Executive power · Geography · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Legislature · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Representation (politics · Scope (computer science · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration

  • Parliaments and Coalitions

    Leonard W Martins, Lanny W Martin et al.•Parliaments and coalitions•2011

  • The Handbook of National Legislatures

    Open Access•M Steven Fish, Matthew Kroenig•Handbook of National Legislatures•2009

  • The Oxford handbook of legislative studies

    Kaare Strom, Shane Martins et al.•The Oxford handbook of…•2014

  • Parliamentary Democracy in Crisis

    Peter H Russell, Lorne Sossin•Parliamentary Democracy in Crisis•2009

  • Partisan-motivated prorogation and the Westminster model

    Gerard W Horgan•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2014

  • Brexit and the British Constitution

    Open Access•Jonathan Sumption•The Political Quarterly•2020

  • Modes of UK Executive–Legislative Relations Revisited

    Open Access•Meg Russell, Patrick Cowley•The Political Quarterly•2018

  • Measuring Legislative Power

    Open Access•Svitlana Chernykh, David Doyle et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Arend Lijphart and the Transformation of Irish Democracy

    Hament Bulsara, Bill Kissane•West European Politics•2009

  • Beyond committees

    Shane Martins, Richard Whitaker•West European Politics•2019

  • Trust Is Good, Control Is Better

    Open Access•Audrey André, Sam Depauw et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • The Changing Confidence Relationship Between the UK Executive and Parliament in Comparative Context

    Open Access•Petra Schleiter, Georgina Evans•Parliamentary Affairs•2019

  • Never Allow A Crisis To Go To Waste

    Meg Russell•Parliamentary Affairs•2011

  • Select Committee Reform

    Open Access•Lucinda Maer•Parliamentary Affairs•2019

  • The Decline of Majoritarianism in the UK and the Fixed-term Parliaments Act

    Petra Schleiter, Valerie Belu•Parliamentary Affairs•2016

  • Does the Executive Dominate the Westminster Legislative Process

    Meg Russell, Daniel Gover et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae