Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

English Identities and Interests and the Governance of Britain

Bibliographic Data

ID6313738
AuthorsC G A Bryant (University of Salford, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume63
Issue2
Pages250-265
Publication date2010-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueParliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pa/gsp030
OpenAlexW2034767777
LanguageEN
Citations received3

Are the identity and interests of the English nation still sufficiently protected by the British state? (the English question). And can the British state still secure sufficient loyalty from all its citizens? (the Britishness question). The omission of England from the programme of devolution implemented by Labour governments since 1999 has not led to a strong demand in England for its inclusion. One reason for this is that most English identities do not need an English parliament for their further articulation. There is an ease of fit between English identity and Britishness as recently reformulated by Gordon Brown and his colleagues. This does not, however, dispose of the English question. England still needs a stronger political voice to protect its interests. The Barnett formula divides annual increases in public spending for a wide range of services between the four parts of the United Kingdom in a way that is unfavourable to England. The British government is unwilling to reform or replace it and, polls suggest, this is widely resented in England. The West Lothian question refers to the anomaly whereby Scottish MPs continue to vote at Westminster on matters pertaining only to England when English MPs cannot vote on equivalent matters pertaining only to Scotland because responsibility for them has been devolved to the Scottish parliament. This, polls suggest, is also widely resented in England, but the British government is disinclined to do anything about it. The only work in hand addressing the Barnett formula and backed by the major British parties (but not the Scottish National Party) is that of the (Calman) Commission on Scottish Devolution set up by the Scottish parliament. Its first report does not anticipate radical change. The only proposal by one of the major parties to answer the West Lothian question is that of the Conservatives’ Democracy Task Force for a version of English Votes on English Laws (EVoEL) that meets many of the objections to earlier versions of EVoEL

Britishness · Common law · Devolution (biology · English law · Home rule · National identity · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Scots · Scots law · Sociology · State (computer science · Welsh · History · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration

  • Britain, Britishness, and exceptionalism within the rhetoric of David Cameron

    Open Access•Mike Bolt•British Politics•2022

  • Federalists in name only? Reassessing the federal credentials of the Liberal Democrats

    Open Access•Adam Evans•British Politics•2014

  • Understanding the social and cultural bases of Brexit

    Open Access•Tak Wing Chan, Morag Henderson et al.•British Journal of Sociology•2020

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2014 - 2022 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae