The Confidence and Supply Agreement between the Conservative Party and the Democratic Unionist Party
Implications for the Barnett Formula and Intergovernmental Relations in the UK
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6313869 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Derek Birrell (University of Ulster, Cromore Road Coleraine, BT52 1SA County Londonderry), Deirdre Heenan (0000-0002-5202-7454, University of Ulster, Cromore Road Coleraine, BT52 1SA County Londonderry) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 586-602 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Parliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pa/gsz012 |
| OpenAlex | W2932919785 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 7 |
This article assesses the implications of the 2017 Confidence and Supply Agreement between the Conservative Party and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) in the context of the Barnett Formula and intergovernmental relations post the devolution settlement and the Good Friday Agreement. In light of the parties’ shared objectives to strengthen and enhance the UK, the Confidence and Supply Agreement, sets out how the DUP would support the minority Conservative government in specific areas, including finance Bills and matters pertaining to the exit from the European Union. This article examines the nature and operation of this Agreement and assesses the extent to which it may be seen to have breached established conventions, rules and principles around devolved funding and the principle of political impartiality enshrined in the Good Friday Agreement. It is argued that the Confidence and Supply Agreement has contributed to the perceived shortcomings of the Barnett Formula as a robust, fair, financial methodology. The distribution of money to the devolved administrations should be modernised and based on need, accountability and transparency. It is also concluded that being locked into a parliamentary deal undermines the UK Government’s ability to be impartial between the competing interests in Northern Ireland
Accountability · Democracy · Impartiality · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
The Twilight of the United Kingdom & Tiocfaidh ár lá
The Barnett Allocation Mechanism
Embeddedness of UK devolution finance within the public expenditure system
Supplying Confidence or Trouble? The Deal Between the Democratic Unionist Party and the Conservative Party
Contested Constitutionalism? Northern Ireland and the British–Irish Relationship since 2010
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2021 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |