Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics

Bibliographic Data

ID6314014
AuthorsMarkus Wagner (0000-0002-0036-1266, University of Vienna, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume65
Issue2
Pages470-477
Publication date2012-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueParliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pa/gsr038
OpenAlexW2329070176
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited13

What do Members of Parliament (MPs) actually do? Many constituents might struggle to give an answer to that question. As Tony Wright (2010, p. 299) notes, being an MP means having a ‘job without any job description at all’. One activity of MPs is generally quite clear: they vote in the House of Commons. In doing so, they either provide the government with a majority or form its opposition in Parliament. Their position is that of the essential link between the mass of voters and the single government that is formed as a result of the ballots they cast (Strøm, 2000). The expectation of much political science research is that MPs in the UK will tend to vote in very cohesive party blocs. Yet, their voting behaviour has become known less for its cohesion and more for the level of dissent, which has increased dramatically in the last decades (Norton, 1975, 1980; Cowley, 2002, 2005). There is no sign that the current Parliament is any exception to this trend (Cowley and Stuart, 2010). The levels of dissent in the UK are relatively high compared with those in similar systems such as Australia and New Zealand (before 1996); Canada, with its frequent minority governments, has similar levels of dissent as the UK (Kam, 2009, chapter 3). Much effort has been devoted to studying why MPs vote against their party (e.g. Cowley, 2002, 2005; Benedetto and Hix, 2007

Dissent · House of Commons · Opposition (politics · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Voting · Wright · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · History · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • Communicating the Rift

    Dominik Duell, Lea Kaftan et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Dropping the Curtain

    Open Access•Eva-Maria Euchner, Caroline Preidel•Politics and Religion•2018

  • Membership ballots and the value of intra-party democracy

    Fabio Wolkenstein•Critical Review of International…•2016

  • Loyal Activists? Party Socialization and Dissenting Voting Behavior in Parliament

    Open Access•Philipp Mai, Georg Wenzelburger•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Voting Behaviour in the 19th German Bundestag and Beyond

    Philipp Mai, Moritz Link et al.•German Politics•2024

  • Politicians as Party Hacks

    Troels Bøggild•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • Symbols of the Struggle

    Bryce J Dietrich, Mark Hayes et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Whose bread I don’t eat, his song I don’t sing? MPs’ outside earnings and dissenting voting behaviour

    Open Access•Philipp Mai•Party Politics•2022

  • What are MPs for

    Open Access•Toni Wright, Tony Wright•The Political Quarterly•2010

  • Consensus and Structure in Legislative Norms

    Edward Crowe, Edward W Crowe•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Do Candidates Make a Difference? Gender, Race, Ideology and Incumbency

    P Norris, Elizabeth Vallance et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•1992

  • Constituency Service by Members of Parliament

    Philip Norton, David Wood•Parliamentary Affairs•1990

  • The Web of Authority

    Open Access•Edward Crowe, Edward W Crowe•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1986

  • Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain

    Open Access•Nick Vivyan, Markus Wagner•European Journal of Political…•2012

  • The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected

    Open Access•Giacomo Benedetto, Simon Hix•Comparative Political Studies•2007

  • Where's the Party

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • The electoral effectiveness of constituency campaigning in the 2010 British general election

    Open Access•Justin Fisher, David Cutts et al.•Electoral Studies•2011

  • MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British Politics

    Open Access•Andrew C Eggers, Jens Hainmueller•American Political Science Review•2009

  • Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies

    Open Access•Torun Dewan, Arthur Spirling•American Political Science Review•2011

  • Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure

    Open Access•Daniel Diermeier, Timothy Feddersen et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament

    Open Access•Christopher Kam, William T Bianco et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,8
Citation span2016 - 2024 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae