What’s not to trust? Rubrics of political party trustworthiness in Chile and Argentina

Bibliographic Data

ID6314747
AuthorsRyan E Carlin (0000-0002-0945-205X, Georgia State University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume20
Issue1
Pages63-77
Publication date2014-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParty Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-0688 • E-ISSN: 1460-3683
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1354068811411025
OpenAlexW2036438021
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited48

No political institutions enjoy less public trust than political parties. Understanding the implications of this phenomenon for representative democracy requires theoretically informed conceptualizations of party trust and distrust and theories about their underlying cognitive processes. In this vein, the present study conceptualizes party trust and distrust as perceived party trustworthiness, it models citizens' subjective standards as rubrics of party trustworthiness, and it derives rubric-based measures of party trust/distrust. The analyses identify rubrics that: (1) prize integrity and competence, (2) stress internal politics and competence, and (3) give priority to responsiveness and integrity. The rubric-based measures of party trust/distrust converge with a classic measure of party trust and, thus, bolster the conceptual validity and theoretical utility of this research. The results suggest new ways by which to measure party trust and distrust on public opinion surveys

Competence (human resources · Credibility · Democracy · Distrust · Law and economics · Party platform · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public relations · Public trust · Rubric · Sociology · Trustworthiness · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social Capital and Networks · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub