Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using MP statements to explain voting behaviour in the German Bundestag

An individual level test of the Competing Principals Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID6314944
AuthorsUlrich Sieberer (0000-0003-4027-1393, University of Konstanz, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume21
Issue2
Pages284-294
Publication date2015-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParty Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-0688 • E-ISSN: 1460-3683
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1354068812472584
OpenAlexW2128795101
LanguageEN
Citations received34
References cited32

Why do members of parliament (MPs) vote against the party line? Recent explanations of party unity focus on MPs cross-pressured between the demands of competing principals such as their party and local constituencies. This article tests key claims of the Competing Principals Theory on the level of individual deputies. It relies on public statements in which MPs explain their voting behaviour. This new data source allows more direct insights into MPs’ decision-making calculus than roll-call data. The article develops a theoretical model for the usage of such statements and the position MPs take vis-à-vis the party line. Empirically, it studies Explanations of Votes on all roll-call votes in the 16th German Bundestag (2005–2009) statistically controlling for sample selection. The analyses show among others things that district MPs take more critical stances, party leaders dissent less and government MPs are more likely to voice reservations without defecting in voting

Dissent · German · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Linguistics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration

  • Migrationsforschung (inter)disziplinär

    Open Access•Merve Schmitz-Vardar, Andrea Rumpel et al.•Migrationsforschung disziplinär•2022

  • Does a district mandate matter for the behavior of politicians? An analysis of roll-call votes and parliamentary speeches

    Open Access•Andreas Born, Aljoscha Janssen•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • Gatekeeping the Plenary Floor

    Open Access•Caroline Bhattacharya•Politics and Governance•2020

  • Using non-legislative tools when legislation is hard

    Open Access•Osnat Akirav•British Politics•2021

  • The adoption of women’s legislative caucuses worldwide

    Marie Jeanne Adams, Melinda J Adams et al.•International Feminist Journal of…•2019

  • West Lothians in the European Parliament? Diverging Vote Choices in Cases of Differentiated Integration

    Open Access•David Steinecke, Max Heermann•Swiss Political Science Review•2024

  • Simply a matter of context? Partisan contexts and party loyalties on free votes

    Open Access•Christopher D Raymond•The British Journal of Politics…•2017

  • Survival of the social? Effects of intra-party cooperation on MP renomination

    Open Access•Jan Bucher•Party Politics•2023

  • Restrictive rules of speechmaking as a tool to maintain party unity

    Open Access•Caroline Bhattacharya•Party Politics•2023

  • Aiming higher

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, Wolfgang C Müller•European Political Science Review•2017

  • When politics prevails

    Open Access•Christel Koop, Christine Reh et al.•European Journal of Political…•2018

  • Measuring re-election prospects across electoral systems

    Michael F Stoffel, Ulrich Sieberer•West European Politics•2018

  • Communicating the Rift

    Dominik Duell, Lea Kaftan et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Der Einfluss von Mandatstyp und Wahlkreiseigenschaften auf die inhaltlichen Positionen in Parlamentsreden

    Open Access•Marc Debus, Hanna Bäck•Swiss Political Science Review•2014

  • When Your Name Is on the List, It Is Time to Party

    Tamaki Ohmura•Representation•2014

  • Separating Candidate Valence and Proximity Voting

    Open Access•Dominic Nyhuis•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • When Do Female MPs Represent Women’s Interests? Electoral Systems and the Legislative Behavior of Women

    Open Access•Daniel Höhmann•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Mandate type, electoral safety, and defections from the party line

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, Tamaki Ohmura•Party Politics•2021

  • Two Faces of Party Unity

    Open Access•Thomas Zittel, Dominic Nyhuis•Parliamentary Affairs•2019

  • When the Worlds of Preferences Collide

    Open Access•Matteo Cm Casiraghi, Luigi Curini•Parliamentary Affairs•2022

  • Are Backbenchers Fighting Back? Intra-Party Contestation in German Parliament Debates on the Greek Crisis

    Open Access•Caroline Bhattacharya, Alexandros Papageorgiou et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2019

  • Voting Behaviour on Free Votes

    Christopher D Raymond•Parliamentary Affairs•2016

  • Competing Principals in a Multinational State

    Open Access•Philip J Howe, David Steinecke et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Who Represents the Constituency? Online Political Communication by Members of Parliament in the German Mixed‐Member Electoral System

    Open Access•Lena Schürmann, Sebastian Stier•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Campaigns and the Selection of Policy‐Seeking Representatives

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Gail Mcelroy et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Responsiveness and Democratic Accountability

    Open Access•Christian Breunig, Emiliano Grossman et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Recorded Votes as Attention Booster

    Open Access•Lukas Hohendorf, Ulrich Sieberer et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Advancing to positions of power in parliament – does seniority matter

    Till Heinsohn, Melissa Schiefer•Journal of Legislative Studies•2019

  • Divided they fail

    Tim Heinkelmann‐wild, Lisa Kriegmair et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2020

  • Competing Principals 2.0? The impact of Facebook in the 2013 selection of the Italian Head of State

    Open Access•Andrea Ceron•Italian Political Science…•2016

  • The Impact of German MPs’ Outside Activities on Their Parliamentary Careers

    Pauline Büsken, Florian Spohr•German Politics•2025

  • The Legislative Effects of Campaign Personalization An Analysis on the Legislative Behavior of Successful German Constituency Candidates

    Open Access•Thomas Zittel, Dominic Nyhuis•Comparative Political Studies•2021

  • Roll-Call Votes in the German Bundestag

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, Thomas Saalfeld et al.•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • Institutional personalism and personalised behaviour

    Open Access•Or Tuttnauer, Gideon Rahat•Electoral Studies•2025

  • Germany

    Thomas Saalfeld•The politics of electoral systems•2005

  • Generalized Latent Variable Modeling

    Anders Skrondal, Sophia Rabe-Hesketh•Generalized Latent Variable…•2004

  • The Personal Vote

    Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain et al.•Personal Vote•1987

  • Legislative Voting and Accountability

    Open Access•John Michael Carey•Legislative voting and…•2008

  • Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics

    Open Access•Christopher Kam, Christopher J Kam•Party Discipline and Parliamentary…•2009

  • Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error

    James J Heckman•Econometrica•1979

  • Der Gesetzgeber

    Open Access•Klaus Von Beyme•Gesetzgeber•1997

  • Parteisoldaten und Rebellen

    Open Access•Thomas Saalfeld•Parteisoldaten und Rebellen•1995

  • The Personal Vote

    Open Access•William H Flanigan•Political Science Quarterly•1988

  • Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches

    Open Access•Sven-Oliver Proksch, Jonathan B Slapin et al.•British Journal of Political…•2010

  • Electoral rules and legislative turnover

    Philip Manow•West European Politics•2007

  • Pathways to party unity

    Open Access•Rudy B Andeweg, Jacques Thomassen•Party Politics•2011

  • Party unity in parliamentary democracies

    Ulrich Sieberer•Journal of Legislative Studies•2006

  • German MPs and their roles

    Werner J Patzelt•Journal of Legislative Studies•1997

  • Discipline, Electoral Rules and Defection in the Bundestag, 1983–94

    Marlis Becher, Michael Becher et al.•German Politics•2008

  • Political parties in parliamentary democracies

    Open Access•Wolfgang C Müller•European Journal of Political…•2000

  • The Rejected, the Ejected, and the Dejected

    Open Access•Giacomo Benedetto, Simon Hix•Comparative Political Studies•2007

  • Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship

    Keith Krehbiel•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech

    Open Access•Sven-Oliver Proksch, Sven‐oliver Proksch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting

    Open Access•John Michael Carey•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Incentives to cultivate a personal vote

    Open Access•John Michael Carey, Matthew Soberg Shugart•Electoral Studies•1995

  • Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer•Electoral Studies•2010

  • The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•John D Huber•American Political Science Review•1996

Unique citing works34
Citations per year2,83
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 34

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae