Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Legislative organization in MMP

The case of New Zealand

Bibliographic Data

ID6315014
AuthorsKuniaki Nemoto (0000-0002-3117-2775, University of British Columbia), Robert Pekkanen (University of Washington), Robert J Pekkanen (0000-0002-4634-0954, University of Washington), Ellis S Krau (0000-0002-9632-1372, University of California, USA), Nigel S Roberts (Victoria University of Wellington)
Year2012
Volume18
Issue4
Pages503-521
Publication date2012-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParty Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-0688 • E-ISSN: 1460-3683
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1354068810389634
OpenAlexW2128414927
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited12

How do electoral systems affect legislative organization? The change in electoral systems from Single Member District plurality (SMD) to Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) in New Zealand can illuminate how electoral incentives affect the distribution of cabinet positions. Because in SMD the outcome of individual local districts determines the number of seats a party wins collectively, New Zealand parties deploy cabinet posts in order to shore up the electoral fortunes of individual members. In MMP, the total number of seats a party receives is determined by the votes in the proportional representation (PR) portion for the party, which eliminates the incentives to reward electorally unsafe members with cabinet positions. We show that strong cabinet members, measured through experience as prior terms in the cabinet position, are still likely to be retained

Business · Cabinet (room · Economics · Electoral system · Geography · Incentive · Legislature · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Proportional representation · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · New Zealand Economic and Social Studies · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • A new day, a new way

    Naofumi Fujimura•Japan Forum•2013

  • The Logic of Ministerial Selection

    Robert J Pekkanen, Benjamin Nyblade et al.•Social Science Japan Journal•2014

  • Mixed-Member Election and Candidate Selection in Bolivia's 1993 and 1997 Elections

    Open Access•Miguel Centellas•The Latin Americanist•2015

  • District Competition in Japan’s 2014 Election

    Timothy S Rich, Vasabjit Banerjee•Representation•2016

  • Information and Legislative Organization

    Keith Krehbiel•Information and Legislative…•1991

  • Making Votes Count

    Open Access•Gary W Cox•Making Votes Count•1997

  • Clarify

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Jason Wittenberg et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2003

  • Mixed-Member Electoral Systems

    Matthew Soberg Shugart, Martin P Wattenberg•Mixed-Member Electoral Systems•2003

  • Patterns of democracy

    Laura Morales Diez De Ulzurrun•Choice Reviews Online•2000

  • The positive theory of legislative institutions

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle•Public Choice•1986

  • The New Zealand Constitution

    J F Northey, K J Scott•University of Toronto Law Journal•1964

  • How Much Change

    Fiona Barker, Elizabeth Mcleay•Party Politics•2000

  • Effective” Number of Parties

    Open Access•Markku Laakso, Rein Taagepera•Comparative Political Studies•1979

  • Making the Most of Statistical Analyses

    Gary King, Michael Tomz et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Electoral Incentives in Mixed-Member Systems

    Open Access•Robert Pekkanen, Robert J Pekkanen et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,31
Citation span2013 - 2016 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae