Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Red vs blue hubris

Clarifying the relationship between partisanship and (anti)intellectualism

Bibliographic Data

ID6315396
AuthorsEdward Hohe (0009-0009-0871-6760, The Ohio State University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume30
Issue6
Pages1169-1176
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParty Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-0688 • E-ISSN: 1460-3683
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/13540688241229179
OpenAlexW4391045731
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited29

Recent research advancing our understanding of partisan cognitive differences finds symmetrical partisan routes to epistemic hubris: intellectual identity and anti-intellectual affect. These researchers conclude that epistemic hubris is largely due to intellectual identity among Democrats and anti-intellectual affect among Republicans. I investigate whether these relationships are purely due to a greater prevalence of intellectual identity among Democrats and anti-intellectual affect among Republicans or if these constructs are particularly potent in producing epistemic hubris among those who identify with their associated parties. I present observational evidence that partisanship conditions the influence of anti-intellectual affect on epistemic hubris but do not find that partisanship conditions the influence of intellectual identity. Based on these findings, we can expect Red America’s increasing anti-intellectualism to contribute to increasing epistemic hubris. More broadly, I provide empirical support for understanding intellectual identity and anti-intellectualism as distinct concepts based on their differing relationships with other fundamental political concepts

Aesthetics · Affect (linguistics · Epistemology · Hubris · Identity (music · Intellectualism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Academic Freedom and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science

    Open Access•John T Jost•Journal of Social Issues•2024

  • The Psychology of Moral Conviction

    Open Access•Linda J Skitka, Linda Skitka•Social and Personality Psychology…•2010

  • The Psychology of Moral Conviction

    Linda J Skitka, Linda Skitka et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2021

  • Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated With Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity?

    Open Access•John T Jost, Jaime L Napier et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2007

  • Are Conservatives More Sensitive to Threat than Liberals? It Depends on How We Define Threat and Conservatism

    Jarret T Crawford•Social Cognition•2017

  • One Nation, Two Realities

    Morgan Marietta, David C Barker•One Nation, Two Realities•2019

  • Uninformed Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It

    Arthur Lupia•Uninformed•2016

  • Open versus Closed

    Open Access•Christian D Johnston, Christopher D Johnston et al.•Open Versus Closed•2017

  • Psychology, political ideology, and humor appreciation

    Dannagal G Young, Benjamin E Bagozzi et al.•Psychology of Popular Media Culture•2017

  • Experimental demonstrations of the earned dogmatism effect using a variety of optimal manipulations

    Open Access•Victor Ottati, Chase Wilson et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2018

  • Exceptions that prove the rule--Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies

    John T Jost, Jack Glaser et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2003

  • Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction

    William D Berry, Matt Golder et al.•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Affective Contagion in Effortful Political Thinking

    Open Access•Cengiz Erisen, Milton Lodge et al.•Political Psychology•2014

  • Beyond the Running Tally

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•Political Behavior•2002

  • How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, Jonathan Mummolo et al.•Political Analysis•2019

  • Uninformed Votes

    Larry M Bartels•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives

    Open Access•Cheryl Boudreau, Scott A Mackenzie•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Rumors and Health Care Reform

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky•British Journal of Political…•2017

  • The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden, Costas Panagopoulos et al.•Political Psychology•2020

  • Rise of the Trumpenvolk

    Open Access•J Eric Oliver, James E Oliver et al.•The Annals of the American…•2016

  • Effects of Education on Attitude to Protest

    Robert L Hall, Mark Rodeghier et al.•American Sociological Review•1986

  • Intellectualism, Anti-Intellectualism, and Epistemic Hubris in Red and Blue America

    Open Access•David C Barker, Ryan Detamble et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Information Effects in Collective Preferences

    Open Access•Scott L Althau, Scott L Althaus•American Political Science Review•1998

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae