Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Partisan schism in America’s newest swing state

Bibliographic Data

ID6315673
AuthorsMv Hood (University of Georgia), M M Hood (University of Georgia), Seth C Mckee (0000-0002-9889-6532, Oklahoma State University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume29
Issue5
Pages853-864
Publication date2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueParty Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-0688 • E-ISSN: 1460-3683
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/13540688221112895
OpenAlexW4284988103
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited39

We assess the opinions of Georgia voters regarding the 2020 presidential election, election administration, and voting laws following passage of Senate Bill (SB) 202. After the 2020 presidential election and subsequent 2021 Senate runoffs, contests all won by Democrats in Georgia, the Republican-controlled legislature passed SB 202 to appease their agitated and disaffected base of supporters. It appears that SB 202 had the effect of boosting Republican voters’ confidence in Georgia’s election system while registering the opposite effect among Democratic voters. Indeed, across a host of questions, including several asking about specific provisions in SB 202, we find a partisan schism in opinions expressed by Democrats and Republicans

Administration (probate law · Democracy · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Schism · Sociology · State (computer science · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

  • American views about election fraud in 2024

    Open Access•Mitchell Linegar, R Michael Alvarez•Frontiers in Political Science•2024

  • Election Denial, Voter Confidence, and Political Behavior in the 2021 Georgia Senate Runoff Elections

    Open Access•Seth C Mckee, M V Hood et al.•American Politics Research•2025

  • How Much Is a Trump Endorsement Worth

    Open Access•M V Hood, Mv Hood et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2023

  • Party Affiliation in the Southern Electorate

    Open Access•Seth C Mckee•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Southern politics in State and Nation

    V O Key•Southern politics in State and…•1949

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • The Great Alignment

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz•The Great Alignment•2018

  • Party Polarization in Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Polarization in Congress•2008

  • American Rage

    Open Access•Steven W Webster•American Rage•2020

  • Polarized

    James E Campbell•Polarized•2016

  • Myth of the Independent Voter

    Keith Magleby, Elizabeth Orr et al.•Myth of the Independent Voter•1992

  • The Partisan Sort

    Matthew Levendusky•Partisan Sort•2009

  • Uncivil Agreement

    L Mason•Uncivil agreement•2018

  • The Reasoning Voter

    Samuel L Popkin•The Reasoning Voter•1991

  • The Dynamics of Southern Politics

    Seth C Mckee, Seth Mckee•The Dynamics of Southern Politics•2019

  • Insecure Majorities

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Insecure Majorities•2016

  • Identity Crisis

    Open Access•Josh Sides, John Sides et al.•Identity crisis•2018

  • Donald Trump and the Parties

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Why Georgia, Why? Peach State Residents’ Perceptions of Voting‐Related Improprieties and Their Impact on the 2018 Gubernatorial Election

    Open Access•M V Hood, Seth C Mckee•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • A Tale of “Two Souths”

    Open Access•Seth C Mckee, Melanie J Springer•Social Science Quarterly•2015

  • Voter ID Laws

    Open Access•Paul Gronke, William D Hicks et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Behind the Curve

    Open Access•Michael J Hanmer, Kerem Ozan Kalkan•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven Webster et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • No Need to Watch

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Matthew S Levendusky et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Polarization in the American Public

    Morris P Fiorina, Samuel A Abram et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • The Determinants of State Legislator Support for Restrictive Voter ID Laws

    Open Access•William D Hicks, Seth C Mckee et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2016

  • A Principle or a Strategy? Voter Identification Laws and Partisan Competition in the American States

    Open Access•William D Hicks, Seth C Mckee et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2015

  • Negative Partisanship

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven W Webster•Political Psychology•2018

  • Why the Sky Didn't Fall

    Open Access•Nicholas A Valentino, Fabian G Neuner•Political Psychology•2017

  • Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters

    Open Access•Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky•Political Behavior•2010

  • Controversy and Costs

    Open Access•John V Kane, David C Wilson•Political Behavior•2021

  • How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Joseph L Sutherland•Political Behavior•2016

  • The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress

    Open Access•Richard Fleisher, John R Bond•British Journal of Political…•2004

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • The Presidential and Congressional Elections of 2020

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•Political Science Quarterly•2021

  • Party Identification, Realignment, and Party Voting

    Open Access•Warren E Miller•American Political Science Review•1991

  • Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Resurgent Mass Partisanship

    Open Access•Marc J Hetherington•American Political Science Review•2001

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae