Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Can the Biomedical Research Cycle be a Model for Political Science

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6317147
AutoresEvan S Lieberman, Eva Lieberman (0000-0001-9242-5687, autor de correspondencia)
Año2016
Volumen14
Número4
Páginas1054-1066
Fecha de publicación2016-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPerspectives on Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s153759271600298x
OpenAlexW2566648886
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas18
Referencias citadas10

In sciences such as biomedicine, researchers and journal editors are well aware that progress in answering difficult questions generally requires movement through a research cycle: Research on a topic or problem progresses from pure description, through correlational analyses and natural experiments, to phased randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In biomedical research all of these research activities are valued and find publication outlets in major journals. In political science, however, a growing emphasis on valid causal inference has led to the suppression of work early in the research cycle. The result of a potentially myopic emphasis on just one aspect of the cycle reduces incentives for discovery of new types of political phenomena, and more careful, efficient, transparent, and ethical research practices. Political science should recognize the significance of the research cycle and develop distinct criteria to evaluate work at each of its stages

Bioinformatics · Biology · Biomedicine · Data science · Economics · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Incentive · Inference · Management science · Natural (archaeology · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Work (physics · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · History · Artificial Intelligence

  • The Production of Knowledge

    Open Access•Colin Elman, John Gerring et al.•Production of Knowledge•2020

  • Making Young Voters

    Open Access•John B Holbein, D Sunshine Hillygus•Making Young Voters•2020

  • Exploratory Research

    Open Access•Richard Swedberg•Production of Knowledge•2020

  • Theory before method

    Open Access•H Zeynep Bulutgil, Harris Mylonas•International Political Science…•2026

  • Nationalism and Ethnic Mobilization

    Open Access•Manuel Vogt•Nationalities Papers•2025

  • Rethinking Foreign Aid and Legitimacy

    Open Access•Lindsay R Dolan•Studies in Comparative…•2020

  • Updating Bayesian(s)

    Open Access•Sherry Zak•Political Analysis•2021

  • Testing Theories about Advocacy and Public Policy

    Open Access•Paul Burstein•Perspectives on Politics•2021

  • Strategic Discrimination

    Open Access•Regina Bateson•Perspectives on Politics•2020

  • From Within to Between Nations

    Open Access•Jefferey M Sellers•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • Sweden’s Peculiar Adoption of Proportional Representation

    Open Access•Marcus Kreuzer, Runa Neely•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • A Dialogue with the Data

    Open Access•Tasha Fairfield, Andrew Charman•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • Rebel Natural Resource Exploitation and Conflict Duration

    Open Access•Jon M Conrad, Justin M Conrad et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2019

  • (How) Do Voters Discriminate Against Women Candidates? Experimental and Qualitative Evidence From Malawi

    Open Access•Anthony Clayton, Amanda Clayton et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • Qualitative Methods

    John Gerring•Annual Review of Political Science•2017

  • Transparent Social Inquiry

    Colin Elman, Diana Kapiszewski et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Democracy dismissed

    Open Access•Kathleen Klaus, Megan Turnbull•Journal of Peace Research•2025

  • Reflexivity and Temporality in Researching Violent Settings

    Kai M Thaler•Geopolitics•2021

  • Designing Social Inquiry

    Gary King, Robert O Keohane et al.•Designing Social Inquiry•1994

  • Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

    Donald B Rubin•Journal of Educational Psychology•1974

  • Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Thad Dunning•Natural Experiments in the Social…•2012

  • Canons of research design in qualitative analysis

    Open Access•Gerardo L Munck•Studies in Comparative…•1998

  • Social science methodology

    Open Access•Adrie Dassen, Kostas Gemenis•Acta Politica•2012

  • Fishing, Commitment, and Communication

    Open Access•Michael Humphreys, Macartan Humphreys et al.•Political Analysis•2013

  • Mere Description

    Open Access•John Gerring•British Journal of Political…•2012

  • The Promising Integration of Qualitative Methods and Field Experiments

    Open Access•Elizabeth Levy Paluck•The Annals of the American…•2010

Obras citantes distintas18
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2017 - 2026 (10)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 18
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae