Lockean Switching
Imagination and the Production of Principles of Toleration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6318364 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susan P Liebell (Saint Joseph's University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 823-836 |
| Publication date | 2009-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1537592709991824 |
| OpenAlex | W2113498455 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 24 |
John Locke'sA Letter Concerning Tolerationintroduces an early form of John Rawls's “original position” in order to shift the rhetorical ground in seventeenth-century England in favor of religious toleration. His method, which I call “Lockean switching,” seeks to induce readers to switch perspectives on the question of coercion of religious belief. This method yields three insights. First, although liberals typically assume that group identification stimulates passions beyond our ability to reason, Lockean switching reveals that the emotive qualities of group interest can actually help reinforce our commitment to and understanding of liberal principles. Locke thus insists that imagination and emotional response canencouragereason and increase impartiality. Locke's carefully crafted scenarios force readers to consider hard political questions, something underscored by comparing Locke's rhetorical strategies with those of two other important liberals, Montesquieu and Rawls. Second, Locke's invocation of remote “outsiders” such as Jews and pagans humanizes the hated minorities of his time and place. But it also risks reifying the majority group and inflaming prejudice. Finally, Lockean switching reminds us that liberals must be alert to the dangers of pushing readers to accept principles that are reasonable but impossible to implement. By exploring Locke's method of shifting perspectives, and connecting it to a broader liberal tradition of “switching,” I argue that contemporary liberals can use imagination and group identification to help reinforce the commitment of individuals and groups to liberal principles with which they might not otherwise identify. I conclude by illustrating this with regard to controversies surrounding the toleration of gays, lesbians and transgendered individuals in the US
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Passions · Political science · Politics · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Toleration · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions
Philo-semitism and the readmission of the Jews to England, 1603-1655
Tastes of paradise
An Approach to Political Philosophy
City of Capital
The Principles of Representative Government
The Political Thought of John Locke
Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government
A Theory of Justice
The Impracticality of Impartiality
A Letter Concerning Toleration
Reason and Feeling in Thinking about Justice
Shakespeare and the Jews
Islam in Britain, 1558–1685
The Cambridge Companion to Rawls
Shakespeare and the Jews
John Locke and the ‘Turbanned Nations’
John Locke
The Political Thought of John Locke
John Locke and the Jews
English Accounts of Captivity in North Africa and the Middle East
Turning Turk
Turks, Moors, and Englishmen in the Age of Discovery
The Library of John Locke
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |