Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Litigating Policy Drift

Frozen Categories and Thresholds in Court

Bibliographic Data

ID6322896
AuthorsUrsula Hackett (0000-0002-1768-9006, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume22
Issue4
Pages1065-1076
Publication date2024-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePerspectives on Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s153759272300292x
OpenAlexW4389923974
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited30

The combination of rigid policy rules with shifting political, economic, and social environments can produce drift: policy change without formal modification. We know much about the political origins and consequences of drift but little about the legal battles that accelerate or impede it. I identify two distinct forms of policy rigidity that generate drift: interval freezing and categorical freezing. Drawing from recent and historical cases encompassing voting rights, racial discrimination, religious conscience protections, and other hot-button issues, I argue that drifting policies possess several sources of legal resilience: injuries are difficult to identify; judges can be persuaded of the merits of restraint, textual formalism, and bright-line rules; and policy makers plausibly deny any intentional action in pursuit of controversial outcomes. Drift is not an automatic and unremarkable process of continual policy change but rather the outcome of high-stakes political and legal contestation over how rigid policy thresholds and categories should be adapted to meet shifting conditions

Categorical variable · Conscience · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Voting · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Responsibility Attribution for Supreme Court Decision-Making

    Open Access•Robin Bayes, K Ramanathan et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2026

  • The Major Questions Doctrine

    Open Access•K Ramanathan, Warren Snead•The Forum•2025

  • Dilutive Drift

    Open Access•Ursula Hackett•Perspectives on Politics•2026

  • Rethinking America's racial policy alliances

    Open Access•Ursula Hackett•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2024

  • Drift and conversion

    Open Access•Jacob S Hacker, Paul Pierson et al.•Advances in Comparative-Historical…•2015

  • Informal Caregiving and the Politics of Policy Drift in the United States

    Philip Rocco•Journal of Aging & Social Policy•2017

  • Policy Feedback

    Open Access•Daniel Béland, Andrea Louise Campbell et al.•Policy Feedback•2022

  • Policy Drift

    Jacob S Hacker•Beyond continuity•2005

  • Economic Inequality and the Violation Economy

    Open Access•Biko Koenig•Poverty & Public Policy•2018

  • The Political Effects of Policy Drift

    Open Access•Daniel J Galvin, Jacob S Hacker•Studies in American Political…•2020

  • The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the “Living Constitution” in the Course of American State-Building

    Open Access•Howard Gillman•Studies in American Political…•1997

  • Reassessing Policy Drift

    Open Access•Daniel Béland, Philip Rocco et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2016

  • Ideas and Institutional Change in Social Security

    Open Access•Daniel Béland•Social Science Quarterly•2007

  • Policy drift and its reversal

    Open Access•Ilana Shpaizman•Public Administration•2017

  • Policy termination as a political process

    Open Access•Eugene Bardach•Policy Sciences•1976

  • Institutional Control of Redistricting and the Geography of Representation

    Barry Edwards, Michael H Crespin et al.•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Courts and the Puzzle of Institutional Stability and Change

    Open Access•Jeb Barnes•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Institutional Strangulation

    Open Access•Daniel Carpenter•Perspectives on Politics•2010

  • Deterring Wage Theft

    Open Access•Daniel J Galvin•Perspectives on Politics•2016

  • Chevron, State Farm, and the Impact of Judicial Doctrine on Bureaucratic Policymaking

    Open Access•Alan E Wiseman, John Wright et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • The Policyscape and the Challenges of Contemporary Politics to Policy Maintenance

    Open Access•Suzanne Mettler•Perspectives on Politics•2016

  • After the “Master Theory

    Open Access•Jacob S Hacker, Paul Pierson•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • From metaphors to measures

    Open Access•Philip Rocco, Chloe Thurston•Journal of Public Policy•2014

  • How Party Polarization Affects Governance

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Annual Review of Political Science•2015

  • Bringing the Courts Back In

    Jeb Barnes•Annual Review of Political Science•2007

  • Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State

    Open Access•Jacob S Hacker•American Political Science Review•2004

  • The Supreme Court as an Agent of Policy Drift

    Open Access•Warren Snead•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Changing Marriage Patterns Since 1970

    Gary R Lee, Krista K Payne et al.•Journal of Comparative Family…•2010

  • Winner-Take-All Politics

    Open Access•Jacob S Hacker, Paul Pierson•Latin American Politics and Society•2010

Unique citing works4
Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae