Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who Regulates Phones, Television, and the Internet? What Makes a Communications Regulator Independent and Why It Matters

Bibliographic Data

ID6325260
AuthorsIrene Wu (0000-0001-7086-0813, Georgetown University, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume6
Issue4
Pages769-783
Publication date2008-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePerspectives on Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1537592708081905
OpenAlexW2082546488
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited14

More political scientists should engage in the debates surrounding regulation of communications networks, the infrastructure on which telecom, media, and Internet services ride. In 1990 there were 14 communications regulators worldwide, by 2007 there were 148. To fulfill World Trade Organization Agreement on Basic Telecommunications commitments, many countries aim to create regulatory agencies that are “independent.” What characterizes independence? Regulators are embedded in a political context that includes three main constituencies : other government institutions, industry, and consumers. Independent regulators are able to take action autonomously from other government institutions and industry while serving as advocates for consumers. In a survey of 18 countries, several traits emerge; a leader who cannot be dismissed arbitrarily, regulatory authority clearly distinct from policymaking, independent funding, minimal staff exchange between regulator and regulated firm, and dedicated support for consumers. It is usually easier for a regulator to be independent if operators are privatized. In a study of 4 countries, independent regulators follow decision-making procedures that give the public notice about proposed rule changes, opportunities to provide comments, and final decisions with explanation. Also, independent regulators have gift, conflict of interest, and post-employment rules, which set ethical standards and expectations for staff

Business · Context (archaeology · Government (linguistics · Independence (probability theory · Notice · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Regulator · Set (abstract data type · Telecommunications · The Internet · Digital Platforms and Economics · Engineering · ICT Impact and Policies · Law · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • Conflict of interest in government

    Open Access•Archon Fung, D F Thompson et al.•Governance•2024

  • Diffusion, transmutation, and regulatory regime in socialist market economies

    Yukyung Yeo, Martin Painter•The Pacific Review•2011

  • Regulation and time

    Open Access•Joshua Newman, Michael Howlett•International Review of…•2014

  • Quo Vadis? Career paths of Brazilian regulators

    Open Access•Alketa Peci, Aline De Menezes Santos et al.•Regulation & Governance•2022

  • Regulating Europe

    Giandomenico Majone•Regulating Europe•2002

  • The political economy of industrial policy in Korea

    Ha-Joon Chang, Ha‐joon Chang•Cambridge Journal of Economics•1993

  • Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States

    J Mark Ramseyer, Peter F Cowhey et al.•Pacific Affairs•1996

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,27
Citation span2011 - 2024 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae