Must Egalitarians Choose Between Fairness and Respect
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6325834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timothy Hinton (0000-0002-7966-8489, North Carolina State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-87 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy & Public Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-3915 • E-ISSN: 1088-4963 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00072.x |
| OpenAlex | W2000945162 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 5 |
Citation · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Toleration · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Religion and Society Interactions · War, Ethics, and Justification
Philosophical Foundations of Labor Law
If We Value Individual Responsibility, Which Policies Should We Favour?
Luck Egalitarianism and Democratic Equality
Defending Luck Egalitarianism
Cultural Exemptions, Expensive Tastes, and Equal Opportunities
Levelling the Playing Field
Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos Revisited
Public goods and fairness
Left‐Liberalism Revisited
The Metaphysical Case for Luck Egalitarianism
Relational Egalitarianism
Respect and Criminal Justice
Relational Egalitarianism
Socialism and non-domination
Some are more ‘equal’ than others
Does domination require unequal power
Making Justice Sensitive to Responsibility
Relational egalitarianism
Luck Egalitarianism
| Citations per year | 0.9 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2025 (21) |
| Highly cited | No |