Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Developing devolution's scrutiny potential

A comparative evaluation of the National Assembly for Wales's Subject Committees

Bibliographic Data

ID6326489
AuthorsLaura Mcallister, L L Mcallister (University of Liverpool), Diana S Stirbu (0000-0003-2935-573X, University of Liverpool), Diana Stirbu
Year2007
Volume35
Issue2
Pages289-309
Publication date2007-04-24
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolicy & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0305-5736 • E-ISSN: 1470-8442
PublisherBristol University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1332/030557307780713031
OpenAlexW2016087111
LanguageEN
Citations received12

This article examines a critical component of devolution's internal architecture – the National Assembly for Wales's Subject Committees. It focuses specifically on their scrutiny capacity by exploring both their statutory framework, and their formal and informal operation. Our evaluation offers international comparisons between the Welsh model and patterns of committee operation in Nordic (mainly Scandinavian) parliaments, both of which depart from more traditional Westminster committee models. We suggest improvements in Wales compatible with substantially increased Assembly powers after May 2007. We further highlight lessons from the distinctive committee model in Wales that might be extrapolated for use elsewhere

Devolution (biology · Geography · Library science · Political science · Scrutiny · Sociology · Statutory law · Subject (documents · Welsh · Computer Science · Historical Studies of British Isles · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration · Scottish History and National Identity

  • The Routledge Handbook of British Politics and Society

    Mark Garnett, Helena Pillmoor•Routledge Handbook of British…•2020

  • Who is in the room? Representing diversity in parliamentary committee evidence in the UK

    Hannah Johnson•European Journal of Politics and…•2023

  • A Place at the Table? Parliamentary Committees, Witnesses and the Scrutiny of Government Actions and Legislation

    Open Access•Hugh Bochel, Anouk Berthier•Social Policy and Society•2019

  • Does decentralisation make a difference? Comparing the democratic performance of central and regional governing systems in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Felicity Matthews•The British Journal of Politics…•2017

  • Social policy formulation and the role of professionals

    Open Access•John Gal, Idit Weiss‐Gal•Health & Social Care in the…•2010

  • The 2011 Welsh General Election

    L Mcallister, L L Mcallister et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2014

  • Evaluating and Theorising Committee Scrutiny

    Michael S Cole, Michael Cole et al.•Local Government Studies•2015

  • Chronicling National Assembly committees as markers of institutional change

    Diana S Stirbu, Laura Mcallister et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•2018

  • Implementation and the Governance Problem

    Open Access•Paul Cairney•Public Policy and Administration•2009

  • Do public consultations work? The case of the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Bill

    Open Access•Axel Kaehne, Helen Taylor•Public Policy and Administration•2016

  • Devolution and the enhancement of scrutiny

    Open Access•Michael S Cole, Michael Cole•Public Policy and Administration•2014

  • Social Workers as Policy Actors

    Open Access•Idit Weiss-Gal, Idit Weiss‐Gal et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2014

Citations per year0.71
Citation span2009 - 2023 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae