Identifying poverty in rural England
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6327602 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Noble (University of Oxford), Gemma Wright (University of Oxford) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 293-308 |
| Publication date | 2000-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0305-5736 • E-ISSN: 1470-8442 |
| Publisher | Bristol University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1332/0305573002500974 |
| OpenAlex | W2051779664 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
This article demonstrates how benefit dependent households can be identified at small area levels in rural areas. Current debates about the nature and extent of rural poverty are outlined. We then explain how municipal administrative data can be mapped at different spatial levels - Enumeration District and 500 metre grid squares. Such data at small spatial levels are potentially useful components of national indices of deprivation for the allocation of central government resources to local authorities. There remains a need for measures of poverty that can be consistently applied to urban and rural areas for the purposes of national funding allocation
Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Government (linguistics · Political science · Poverty · Regional science · Rural area · Rural poverty · Socioeconomics · demographic modeling and climate adaptation · Rural development and sustainability · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
The rural pay penalty
Increasing the sophistication of access measurement in a rural healthcare study
What can rural agencies do to address the additional costs of rural services? A typology of rural service innovation
The Geography of Disadvantage in Rural Scotland
Inner Peripheries in the Czech Republic
Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rural Areas
The (mis)Representation of Rural Deprivation
Measuring Inequality in Rural England
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,31 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2017 (18) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |