Perceived Risk and Citizen Preferences for Governmental Management of Routine Hazards
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6328100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brian J Gerber (0000-0002-2157-3671, West Virginia University), Grant W Neeley (0000-0003-2323-0848, University of Dayton) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 395-418 |
| Publication date | 2005-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Studies Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00122.x |
| OpenAlex | W2017801852 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 28 |
| References cited | 47 |
Risk perceptions are important to the policy process because they inform individuals’ preferences for government management of hazards that affect personal safety, public health, or ecological conditions. Studies of risk in the policy process have often focused on explicating the determinants of risk perceptions for highly salient, high consequence hazards (e.g., nuclear energy). We argue that it is useful to also study more routinely experienced hazards; doing so shows the relevance of risk perceptions in individuals’ daily lives. Our investigation focuses on the impact perceived risk has on citizens’ preferences over hazard management policies (as distinct from identifying risk perception determinants per se). We use a recursive structural equation model to analyze public opinion data measuring attitudes in three distinct issue domains: air pollution, crime, and hazardous waste storage and disposal. We find that citizens utilize perceived risk rationally: greater perceived risk generally produces support for more proactive government to manage potential hazards. This perceived risk–policy response relationship generally holds even though the policy options respondents were asked to consider entailed nontrivial costs to the public. The exception seems to be when individuals know less about the substantive issue domain
Actuarial science · Affect (linguistics · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Government (linguistics · Hazard · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public opinion · Public policy · Relevance (law · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk assessment · Risk management · Risk perception · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Disaster Management and Resilience · Medicine · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Finance
The Effects of Confidence in Government and Information on Perceived and Actual Preparedness for Disasters
Cultural worldviews and support for governmental management of Covid-19
The impact of risk communication, trust, and coping appraisal on individual preparedness decisions in geological hazard-prone areas
Electoral cycles in environmental outcomes in India
The Role of Civic Participation for Environmental Policy Support
Latino Migrant Farmworkers in Lowcountry South Carolina
Measuring Risk Perception in Pregnant Women in Heavily Polluted Areas
Toxic Releases and Risk Disparity
Disaster Risk Resilience in Colima-Villa de Alvarez, Mexico
Crude Contempt
Facing a Crisis with Calmness? The Global Response to the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
Assessing policy preferences for preventing and managing wildfire in Greece
Sandbagged
Functional fragmentation in city hall and Twitter communication during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Ready or Not? How Citizens and Public Officials Perceive Risk and Preparedness
Contemplating the Role of Precision and Range in Homeland Security Policy Analysis
Linking migration to community resilience in the receiving basin of a large-scale water transfer project
Framing the approval to test self-driving cars on public roads. The effect of safety and competitiveness on citizens' agreement
Institutions, interests, and policy support
Between Trust and Blame
Covid-19 memorable messages as internal narratives
Advocacy strategies of industry and environmental interest groups in oil and gas policy debates
How culture shapes environmental public participation
Which Trust, Which Compliance
Multidimensional preference for technology risk regulation
The Boston Marathon Bombings
Cultural Worldview and Preference for Childhood Vaccination Policy
Fearing Food
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology 1
Judgment under Uncertainty
Prospect Theory
Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste
Informing and Educating the Public About Risk
Risk and Culture
The Media and Genetically Modified Foods
The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology
Age Variations in Risk Perceptions and Smoking Decisions
Understanding Public Opinion in Post-Communist States
Why not here
Waste facility experience and perceptions of waste-related health and safety risks
Assessing and Managing Risk in the Public Sector
Public perception of technological risk
Citizen experts in environmental risk
The Social Amplification of Risk
Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks
Government Risk Regulation
Economic Attitudes and Responses to Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities in Rural Utah 1
Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy
Mapping Patterns of Support for Privatization in the Mass Public
Uncertainty, Risk, Trust, and Information
Ideology and Elites' Perceptions of the Safety of New Technologies
Myths of Nature
The Social Fabric at Risk
| Unique citing works | 28 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,4 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2026 (21) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 28 |