Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Discourse, Party, and Policy

The Case of Abortion, 1965–1972

Bibliographic Data

ID6328282
AuthorsRosemary Nossiff (Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume26
Issue2
Pages244-256
Publication date1998-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01897.x
OpenAlexW2038130489
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited13

The parameters of the contemporary abortion debate were established in the pre‐Roe period between 1965 and 1972, when groups and forces on the state and manual level competed to redefine the issue in order to pass new policies regulating it. This article traces the abortion politics of New York and Pennsylvania, the two states that led the nation in creating abortion policies before Roe, by looking at the relationship between the discourses created by various groups, the agree of party support they received, and the disparate policies that each state pawed as a result

Abortion · Economics · Order (exchange · Period (music · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Pregnancy · Sociology · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · American History and Culture · Law · Public Administration · Race, History, and American Society

  • The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbon energy policy—An accessible introduction

    Open Access•J Ivan Scrase, David Ockwell et al.•Energy Policy•2010

  • Abortion, religion, and racial resentment

    Open Access•Melissa Deckman, Laurel Elder et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2023

  • Feminizing obstetrics or medicalizing midwifery? The discursive constitution of midwifery in Ontario, Canada

    Stephanie Paterson•Critical Policy Studies•2010

  • The behavioral study of political ideology and public policy formulation

    Open Access•Carl Grafton, Anne Permaloff•The Social Science Journal•2005

  • National Determinants of Cloning Policy

    Open Access•Bonnie Stabile•Social Science Quarterly•2006

  • Political Crisis/Fiscal Crisis

    Martin Shefter•Political Crisis/Fiscal Crisis•1986

  • Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood

    Kristin Luker•Abortion and the Politics of…•2019

  • Placing Parties in American Politics

    David R Mayhew•Placing Parties in American…•1986

  • Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice

    Maarten A Hajer•Argumentative Turn in Policy…•1993

  • Power in Movement

    Open Access•Sidney Tarrow, Sidney G Tarrow•Power in Movement•1998

  • Political Life

    Open Access•E E Schattschneider•Political Science Quarterly•1960

  • State Implementation of Supreme Court Decisions

    Susan B Hansen•The Journal of Politics•1980

  • Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest

    Open Access•Herbert Kitschelt, Herbert P Kitschelt•British Journal of Political…•1986

  • Linking Mobilization Frames and Political Opportunities

    M Diani•American Sociological Review•1996

  • Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation

    David A Snow, E Burke Rochford et al.•American Sociological Review•1986

  • The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities

    Open Access•Peter K Eisinger•American Political Science Review•1973

Citations per year0.24
Citation span2005 - 2023 (19)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae