Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Culture and Legal Policy Punctuation in the Supreme Court's Gender Discrimination Cases

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6328360
AutoresRob Robinson (0000-0001-6509-793X, autor correspondente)
Ano2014
Volume42
Fascículo4
Páginas555-589
Data de publicação2014-11-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/psj.12075
OpenAlexW2316912867
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas17
Referências citadas61

For the most part, punctuated equilibrium scholarship has ignored the legal policy change generated by the Supreme Court. In this study, I address this gap though an examination of the Court's equal protection and gender cases from the 1970s. My case study here has two aims. First, I offer an adaptation of the jurisprudential regimes framework as a device for framing and identifying legal policy punctuations. After identifying Reed v. Reed (1971) as the cut point of such a regime, I then use Reed and its progeny to illustrate the promise of culture in explaining stasis and change, specifically focusing on the concepts of cultural cognition and cultural surprise

Framing (construction · Law and economics · Legislation · Linguistics · Political science · Punctuated equilibrium · Punctuation · Scholarship · Sociology · Supreme court · Surprise · History · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • Have policy process scholars embraced causal mechanisms? A review of five popular frameworks

    Open Access•Jeroen Van Der Heijden, Johanna Kuhlmann et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2021

  • Identifying causal mechanisms of unexpected policy change

    Open Access•Maximilian Schiffers, Sandra Plümer•European Policy Analysis•2024

  • Beyond Liberal and Conservative

    Open Access•Rob Robinson, Brendon Swedlow•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Dynamic Adjustment for Disaster Governance in a Party‐State

    Open Access•Zezhao Liu•Review of Policy Research•2025

  • Individual characteristics or cultures? Public risk perception in the coronavirus pandemic

    Jingjing Zeng, Meng Yuan et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2022

  • Comparing cultural theory and cultural cognition theory survey measures to each other and as explanations for judged risk

    Branden B Johnson, Brendon Swedlow•Journal of Risk Research•2019

  • Historical policies affecting women’s military and family roles

    Open Access•Emerald L King, Diana M Dinitto•International Journal of…•2019

  • Cultural Change and Policy Images in Policy Subsystems

    Open Access•Rob Robinson, ROBERT R ROBINSON•Public Administration•2015

  • Introduction to the Symposium

    Open Access•Perri Six, Perri et al.•Public Administration•2016

  • The culture of risk regulation

    Open Access•Salvador Parrado•Regulation & Governance•2018

  • A cultural theory of the culture wars

    Open Access•Brendon Swedlow, Joseph T Ripberger et al.•Political Psychology•2024

  • Advancing Policy Theory with Cultural Theory

    Open Access•Brendon Swedlow•Policy Studies Journal•2014

  • Using Cultural Theory to Specify the Policy Actors, Belief Systems, and Sources of Coalition, Conflict, Stability, and Change in Policy Advocacy Coalitions and Environmental Resource Policies

    Open Access•Metodi Sotirov, Brendon Swedlow•Policy Studies Journal•2025

  • Deciding How to Decide

    Open Access•Kimberly A Horndeski, Tomas M Koontz•Policy Studies Journal•2020

  • Cultural theory, rejection of cultural bias, and party preference

    Open Access•Eero Olli, Brendon Swedlow•Party Politics•2023

  • Judicial reasoning, individual cultural types, and support for Covid-19 vaccine mandates

    Open Access•Christopher Brough, Laura Y Liu et al.•Review of Policy Research•2024

  • Three Cultural Boundaries of Science, Institutions, and Policy

    Open Access•Brendon Swedlow•Review of Policy Research•2017

  • Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Second Edition

    F R Baumgartner, Bryan D Jones•Agendas and Instability in…•2009

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • Gender Politics

    Ethel Klein•Gender Politics•1984

  • Congressional Control or Judicial Independence

    Open Access•Pablo T Spiller, Rafael Gely•The RAND Journal of Economics•1992

  • Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions

    William N Eskridge•The Yale Law Journal•1991

  • The Women's Liberation Movement in America

    Joan Smythe Iversen, Kathleen C Berkeley•The History Teacher•2000

  • Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Thomas H Hammond et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Cultural Theory as Political Science

    Gunnar Grendstad, Martyn P Thompson et al.•Cultural Theory as Political…•2003

  • Risk and Culture

    Mary Douglas, Aaron Wildavsky•Risk and Culture•2019

  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

    Thomas S Kuhn, Thomas Kühn et al.•La Structure des révolutions…•1996

  • Linking Issues to Ideology in the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Lawrence Baum•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • Requisites of Radical Reform

    Open Access•Dennis J Coyle, Dennis Coyle et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1987

  • Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems

    F R Baumgartner, Bryan D Jones•The Journal of Politics•1991

  • Change over Tenure

    Open Access•Erin B Kaheny, Susan B Haire et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Justices and Legal Clarity

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking et al.•Law & Society Review•2011

  • Network Analysis and the Law

    Open Access•J H Fowler, Timothy R Johnson et al.•Political Analysis•2007

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • Change in U.S. Women's Sex-Role Attitudes, 1964-1974

    Karen Oppenheim Mason, John L Czajka et al.•American Sociological Review•1976

  • Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey, Forrest Maltzman•American Political Science Review•2008

  • How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Christopher Casillas, Christopher J Casillas et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Legal Constraints on Supreme Court Decision Making

    Jeffrey R Lax, Kelly Rader et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited

    Kevin T Mcguire, James A Stimson•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Predicting Drift on Politically Insulated Institutions

    Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • The Supreme Court in American Democracy

    Micheal W Giles, Bethany Blackstone et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making

    William Mishler, Reginald S Sheehan•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • When Corrections Fail

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•Political Behavior•2010

  • Endogenous Jurisprudential Regimes

    Open Access•Xun Pang, Barry Friedman et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Stochastic Process Methods with an Application to Budgetary Data

    Open Access•Christian Breunig, Bryan D Jones•Political Analysis•2011

  • Punctuated Equilibrium and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Rob Robinson•Policy Studies Journal•2013

  • Importing Concepts from Biology into Political Science

    Open Access•David F Prindle•Policy Studies Journal•2012

  • From There to Here

    Open Access•Bryan D Jones, F R Baumgartner•Policy Studies Journal•2012

  • Constitutional Blemishes

    Open Access•Mark Lawrence Schrad•Policy Studies Journal•2007

  • Punctuated Equilibria and Budgets in the American States

    Open Access•Christian Breunig, Chris Koski•Policy Studies Journal•2006

  • Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change

    Open Access•Sarah Pralle, Sarah B Pralle•Journal of Public Policy•2003

  • Cultural Contributions to Explaining Institutional Form, Political Change, and Rational Decisions

    Open Access•Charles Lockhart•Comparative Political Studies•1999

  • Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes

    Open Access•Eileen Braman, Thomas E Nelson•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets

    Open Access•Bryan D Jones, F R Baumgartner et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Tom S Clark•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • One Voice Among Many

    Roy B Flemming, John Bohte et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Influence of Law in the Supreme Court’s Search-and-Seizure Jurisprudence

    Open Access•Herbert M Kritzer, Mark J Richards•American Politics Research•2005

  • Arguing about Financial Regulation

    Open Access•Martin Lodge, Kai Wegrich•PS Political Science & Politics•2011

  • Cultural Surprises as Sources of Sudden, Big Policy Change

    Open Access•Brendon Swedlow•PS Political Science & Politics•2011

  • Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

    Dan M Kahan, Hank C Jenkins‐smith et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Organizational Change and Development

    Karl E Weick, Robert E Quinn•Annual Review of Psychology•1999

  • Changes in the Sex Role Attitudes of Women, 1962-1977

    Arland Thornton, Deborah Freedman•American Sociological Review•1979

  • Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions

    Open Access•Aaron Wildavsky•American Political Science Review•1987

  • Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decisionmaking

    Open Access•Herbert M Kritzer, Mark J Richards•Law & Society Review•2003

  • The (Dis)Advantage of Certainty

    Open Access•Pamela C Corley, Justin Wedeking•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Dynamic Representation

    Open Access•James A Stimson, James Stimson et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions

    Bryan D Jones, Tracy Sulkin et al.•American Political Science Review•2003

  • The Supreme Court's Many Median Justices

    Open Access•Benjamin E Lauderdale, Tom S Clark•American Political Science Review•2012

  • Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Mark J Richards, Herbert M Kritzer•American Political Science Review•2002

  • Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Helmut Norpoth, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Political Science Review•1994

  • The Psychological Meaning of Words

    Open Access•Yla R Tausczik, Yla Tausczik et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2010

  • A Cultural Analysis of the Role of Abolitionists in the Coming of the Civil War

    Open Access•Richard Ellis, Richard J Ellis et al.•Comparative Studies in Society…•1990

Obras citantes distintas17
Citações por ano1,42
Intervalo de citações2014 - 2025 (12)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 17
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae