Punishment Policy in the American States from 1890 to 2008
Convergence, Divergence, Synchronous Change, and Feed‐Forward Effects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6329045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne L Schneider (0000-0001-8792-5150, Arizona State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 193-210 |
| Publication date | 2012-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Studies Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00449.x |
| OpenAlex | W1931319170 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 15 |
This analysis of the patterns of change in the use of incarceration by the American states from 1890 through 2008 focuses on multiple themes particularly relevant to an understanding of policy arenas in which the social constructions of target populations play an important role. Specifically, the study examines whether the states have adopted more similar incarceration levels over time (converged), whether they tend to change in the same direction at the same time (synchronous change), and whether they tend to stay in the same relative positions vis‐à‐vis one another, such that the historical policy position has long‐term implications for later policy positions (“feed‐forward” effects).The results indicate that, in spite of a century of social, political, and economic integration, the policy positions of the states have not exhibited a sustained convergence toward a common level of incarceration, but have undergone cycles, with some periods of convergence followed by periods of divergence. Change has generally been synchronous—as states tend to move in the same direction at the same time as if propelled by national forces even though incarceration levels are determined by state and local policy and the use of discretion by criminal justice officials. The results also indicate a profound “feed‐forward” effect in that the position of the states vis‐à‐vis one another historically has substantial predictive power for their position in subsequent years
Convergence (economics · Criminal justice · Discretion · Divergence (linguistics · Economic growth · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Power (physics · Punishment (psychology · State (computer science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Psychology · Social Psychology
Mapping the policy design research
The foresight of Frontlash
Representative Bureaucracy and School Discipline
The Consequences of Decentralization
Policy feedback and institutional context in energy transitions
Rank-order implications of social construction theory
Sexual Orientation in State Hate Crime Laws
Theories of the Policy Process
Latinos and Environmental Justice
Learning from Schools
The People's Intervention
Democratic Laboratories
A Theory of the Stability of Punishment
American Political Development from Citizens' Perspective
The Internationalisation of Public Welfare Policy
Mass Imprisonment and the Life Course
Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research
Patterns of Change in the Use of Imprisonment in the American States
No Race in Any Direction
Conceptualizing and Researching Policy Convergence1
Is there convergence in convergence research? an overview of empirical studies on policy convergence
Introduction
Methodological Pitfalls of Convergence Analysis
Social Construction of Target Populations
Innovation in the States
A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion
| Citations per year | 0.92 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |