Jury Service as an Invitation to Citizenship
Assessing the Civic Value of Institutionalized Deliberation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6329355 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Gastil (0000-0002-0337-1064, University of Washington), Phillip J Weiser |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 605-627 |
| Publication date | 2006-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Studies Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00194.x |
| OpenAlex | W3123752164 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 18 |
When considering the merits of deliberative democracy, it is important to look into the experience of the American jury system. The jury has demonstrated the potential for citizen deliberation to play a central role in longstanding governmental institutions, but it has also played an unrecognized role in promoting civic engagement. Building on previous research demonstrating how jury service spurs increased electoral participation after jury service, we present results from a three‐wave panel survey that show that a subjectively rewarding jury experience can spur broader civic engagement beyond voting. Given the value of the jury as both a model of deliberation and an engine of civic spirit, we consider the potential value of creating citizen juries to improve the initiative process, which currently lacks the citizen deliberation that is essential for any effective direct democratic processes
Business · Citizenship · Civic engagement · Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Jury · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Service (business · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Voting · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics
Types of Deliberation
Making legal sense
The Sociology of Political Representation and Deliberation
Jury Systems Around the World
Editors' Analysis
Summonsing Criminal Desistance
Much Obliged
Pulling Toward or Pulling Away
Jury Service and Electoral Participation
Editors' Analysis
Editors' Analysis
A Field Study of the Presumptively Biased
Understanding the effects of jury service on jurors' trust in courts
Editors' Analysis
By Popular Demand
Bowling alone
The Reasoning Voter
Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy
Democracy and Its Critics
Strong Democracy
Democracy and Difference
Voice and Equality
Community, Communication, and Participation
Civic Awakening in the Jury Room
Against Deliberation
Can Participatory Democracy Produce Better Selves? Psychological Dimensions of Habermas's Discursive Model of Democracy
Deliberativedemocratictheory
The Habermasian public sphere
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,78 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2025 (18) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |