Use and Usefulness of Performance Measurement in State Science and Technology Programs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6329548 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susan E Cozzen (0000-0002-0104-5310, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute), Susan E Cozzens, Julia Melkers (0000-0001-5045-4068, Georgia State University), Julia E Melkers |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 425-435 |
| Publication date | 1997-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Studies Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1997.tb00032.x |
| OpenAlex | W2012731820 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 5 |
Over 40% of state science and technology programs are evaluating their results in some way. Programs have adopted performance measurement systems both for their own information purposes and to justify their activities to external audiences, usually legislatures. Performance measurement activities may have contributed to the evolution of these programs toward economic objectives, which can be measured in business activity. The most common performance measures are job creation and retention
Business · Engineering management · Legislature · Performance measurement · Political science · State (computer science · Computer Science · Education and Public Policy · Engineering · Policy Transfer and Learning · Marketing
Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review
Future-oriented impact assessment
A methodology for identifying results and impacts in technological innovation projects
Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands
Locating Critical Components of Regional Human Capital
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2001 - 2021 (21) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |