Confounding Influences, Unintended Impacts, and Growth Management Policies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6331008 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Phyllis Strong Green (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 893-900 |
| Publication date | 1980-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Studies Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01180.x |
| OpenAlex | W2089082634 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
This study demonstrates the relationship among inputs, indirect effects, and intended and unanticipated consequences in determining the content and scope of growth management policies in three California cities. It shows that while a short time frame obfuscates a number of policy impacts, local policymakers can achieve policy objectives if they are aware of and utilize options that are available to them during the implementation process. The study suggests that despite the very real constraints imposed by state legislation and weak regional governments, local governments can more effectively deal with externalities by adopting complementary city‐county policies and negotiating priorities
Business · Economic policy · Economics · Externality · Growth management · Land use · Legislation · Microeconomics · Negotiation · Political science · Process (computing · Public economics · Scope (computer science · Unintended consequences · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1984 - 1987 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |