They Might Be a Liar But They’re My Liar
Source Evaluation and the Prevalence of Misinformation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6337271 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Briony Swire-Thompson (0000-0001-7464-8940, Northeastern University, corresponding author), Ullrich K H Ecker (0000-0003-4743-313X, The University of Western Australia), Lewandowsky (0000-0003-1655-2013, University of Bristol School of Psychological Science), Adam J Berinsky (0000-0001-7827-9396, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21-34 |
| Publication date | 2020-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/pops.12586 |
| OpenAlex | W2938837629 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 39 |
| References cited | 27 |
Even if people acknowledge that misinformation is incorrect after a correction has been presented, their feelings towards the source of the misinformation can remain unchanged. The current study investigated whether participants reduce their support of Republican and Democratic politicians when the prevalence of misinformation disseminated by the politicians appears to be high in comparison to the prevalence of their factual statements. We presented U.S. participants either with (1) equal numbers of false and factual statements from political candidates or (2) disproportionately more false than factual statements. Participants received fact‐checks as to whether items were true or false, then rerated both their belief in the statements as well as their feelings towards the candidate. Results indicated that when corrected misinformation was presented alongside equal presentations of affirmed factual statements, participants reduced their belief in the misinformation but did not reduce their feelings towards the politician. However, if there was considerably more misinformation retracted than factual statements affirmed, feelings towards both Republican and Democratic figures were reduced—although the observed effect size was extremely small
Democracy · Feeling · Misinformation · Political science · Politics · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
What To Do About Conspiracy Theories?
Searching for the backfire effect
Public Health and Online Misinformation
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It
Populist attitudes and politicians’ disinformation accusations
More criticisms, less mention of politicians, and rare party violations
Measuring social response to different journalistic techniques on Facebook
Liars know they are lying
Disinformation in the Spanish public debate
Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science
Combating Repeated Lies
The Power of a Genre
Strategic Use of Disinformation Terminology in Political Communication
Against modernist illusions
Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking
Judging the Believability of Social Media Misinformation
Dodging the autocratic bullet
Crowddoing and crowdfunding democracy
Counting the Pinocchios
Fiction and misinformation
Strategic Lying”
How Can We Fight Partisan Biases in the Covid-19 Pandemic? AI Source Labels on Fact-checking Messages Reduce Motivated Reasoning
Combatting the persuasive effects of misinformation
Aggro-truth
The effect of traffic light veracity labels on perceptions of political advertising source and message credibility on social media
Patterns of belief and trust in climate change information
Perceiving as biased but nevertheless persuaded? Effects of fact–checking news delivered by partisan media
Fact‐checking election‐campaign misinformation
Social and Cognitive Aspects of the Vulnerability to Political Misinformation
Toward a Research Agenda on Political Misinformation and Corrective Information
The Reputational Penalty
Private Eyes in the Sky
Hedged Language and Partisan Media Influence Belief in Science Claims
Perceived Local Population Dynamics and Immigration Policy Views
Reliable Sources? Correcting Misinformation in Polarized Media Environments
From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by US politicians
Intervening Troubled Marketplace of Ideas
Misinformation and Support for Vigilantism
When Truth Trumps Facts
Sources of the continued influence effect
Logic and Conversation
Science Denial Across the Political Divide
Motivated Rejection of Science
Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government
When credibility attacks
Again and again (and again)
The Effect of Fact‐Checking on Elites
Grassroots Mobilization and Voter Turnout in 2004
Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era
Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections
Fighting the Past
Belief Echoes
The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations
Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans
Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability
Does Time Heal All Wounds? Sex Scandals, Tax Evasion, and the Passage of Time
Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology
The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue
| Unique citing works | 39 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,57 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 39 |