Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

They Might Be a Liar But They’re My Liar

Source Evaluation and the Prevalence of Misinformation

Bibliographic Data

ID6337271
AuthorsBriony Swire-Thompson (0000-0001-7464-8940, Northeastern University, corresponding author), Ullrich K H Ecker (0000-0003-4743-313X, The University of Western Australia), Lewandowsky (0000-0003-1655-2013, University of Bristol School of Psychological Science), Adam J Berinsky (0000-0001-7827-9396, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Year2020
Volume41
Issue1
Pages21-34
Publication date2020-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/pops.12586
OpenAlexW2938837629
LanguageEN
Citations received39
References cited27

Even if people acknowledge that misinformation is incorrect after a correction has been presented, their feelings towards the source of the misinformation can remain unchanged. The current study investigated whether participants reduce their support of Republican and Democratic politicians when the prevalence of misinformation disseminated by the politicians appears to be high in comparison to the prevalence of their factual statements. We presented U.S. participants either with (1) equal numbers of false and factual statements from political candidates or (2) disproportionately more false than factual statements. Participants received fact‐checks as to whether items were true or false, then rerated both their belief in the statements as well as their feelings towards the candidate. Results indicated that when corrected misinformation was presented alongside equal presentations of affirmed factual statements, participants reduced their belief in the misinformation but did not reduce their feelings towards the politician. However, if there was considerably more misinformation retracted than factual statements affirmed, feelings towards both Republican and Democratic figures were reduced—although the observed effect size was extremely small

Democracy · Feeling · Misinformation · Political science · Politics · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • What To Do About Conspiracy Theories?

    Open Access•Natália Slivková, J Harambam•What To Do About Conspiracy…•2024

  • Searching for the backfire effect

    Open Access•Briony Swire-Thompson, Joseph DeGutis et al.•Journal of Applied Research in…•2020

  • Public Health and Online Misinformation

    Open Access•Briony Swire-Thompson, David Lazer•Annual Review of Public Health•2020

  • Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It

    Open Access•Lewandowsky•Annual Review of Public Health•2021

  • Populist attitudes and politicians’ disinformation accusations

    Open Access•Jana Laura Egelhofer, Ming M Boyer et al.•Journal of Communication•2022

  • More criticisms, less mention of politicians, and rare party violations

    Open Access•Siyuan Ma, Junyi Han et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2025

  • Measuring social response to different journalistic techniques on Facebook

    Open Access•Ana Lucía Schmidt, Antonio Peruzzi et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2020

  • Liars know they are lying

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Ullrich K H Ecker et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Disinformation in the Spanish public debate

    Open Access•Ricardo Domínguez-García, Ana María Velasco Molpeceres et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2024

  • Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Stephan Lewandowsky et al.•Cognition•2021

  • Combating Repeated Lies

    Open Access•Irene Larraz, Ramón Salaverría et al.•Media and Communication•2024

  • The Power of a Genre

    Jianing Li, Jordan Foley et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2021

  • Strategic Use of Disinformation Terminology in Political Communication

    Open Access•María Jesús Fernández Torres, Nereida Cea Esteruelas et al.•Social Sciences•2026

  • Against modernist illusions

    Open Access•J Harambam•Journal for Cultural Research•2021

  • Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking

    Lewandowsky, Sander Van Der Linden•European Review of Social…•2021

  • Judging the Believability of Social Media Misinformation

    Open Access•Victoria Ward, Trevor Rowe et al.•Psychological Reports•2026

  • Dodging the autocratic bullet

    Open Access•Christoph M Abels, Kiia Jasmin Alexandra Huttunen et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2024

  • Crowddoing and crowdfunding democracy

    Open Access•Shane Markowitz•New Perspectives•2023

  • Counting the Pinocchios

    Open Access•Alexander Agadjanian, Nikita Bakhru et al.•Research & Politics•2019

  • Fiction and misinformation

    Kaitlyn Davisio, David Malet et al.•Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism…•2026

  • Strategic Lying”

    Open Access•Ivor Gaber, Caroline Fisher•The International Journal of…•2021

  • How Can We Fight Partisan Biases in the Covid-19 Pandemic? AI Source Labels on Fact-checking Messages Reduce Motivated Reasoning

    Won-Ki Moon, M Chung et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2022

  • Combatting the persuasive effects of misinformation

    Open Access•Dian Van Huijstee, Ivar Vermeulen et al.•New Media & Society•2025

  • Aggro-truth

    Jayson Harsin•The Communication Review•2021

  • The effect of traffic light veracity labels on perceptions of political advertising source and message credibility on social media

    Open Access•Tom Dobber, Sanne Kruikemeier et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2023

  • Patterns of belief and trust in climate change information

    Open Access•Victoria Johnson, Victoria A Johnson et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2025

  • Perceiving as biased but nevertheless persuaded? Effects of fact–checking news delivered by partisan media

    Open Access•Je Hoon Chae, Sang Yup Lee et al.•Political Psychology•2024

  • Fact‐checking election‐campaign misinformation

    Open Access•Toby Prike, Joseph Baker et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Social and Cognitive Aspects of the Vulnerability to Political Misinformation

    Open Access•Myrto Pantazi, Scott Hale et al.•Political Psychology•2021

  • Toward a Research Agenda on Political Misinformation and Corrective Information

    Jianing Li•Political Communication•2020

  • The Reputational Penalty

    Open Access•Jacob Ausubel, Annika Davies et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Private Eyes in the Sky

    Open Access•Erik Lin-Greenberg, Theo Milonopoulos•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2021

  • Hedged Language and Partisan Media Influence Belief in Science Claims

    Open Access•Reese Butterfu, Joseph Aubele et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • Perceived Local Population Dynamics and Immigration Policy Views

    Open Access•Stephanie Chan, Tanika Raychaudhuri et al.•American Politics Research•2023

  • Reliable Sources? Correcting Misinformation in Polarized Media Environments

    Open Access•Patrick W Kraft, Nicholas R Davis et al.•American Politics Research•2022

  • From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by US politicians

    Open Access•Jon Lasser, Segun T Aroyehun et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Intervening Troubled Marketplace of Ideas

    Open Access•Homero Gil De Zúñiga, John Namjun Kim•American Behavioral Scientist•2025

  • Misinformation and Support for Vigilantism

    Open Access•Sumitra Badrinathan, Simon Chauchard et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • When Truth Trumps Facts

    Minjae Kim, Oliver Hahl et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2024

  • Sources of the continued influence effect

    Hollyn M Johnson, Colleen M Seifert•Journal of Experimental…•1994

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • Science Denial Across the Political Divide

    Open Access•Anthony N Washburn, Linda J Skitka et al.•Social Psychological and…•2018

  • Motivated Rejection of Science

    Open Access•Lewandowsky, Klaus Oberauer•Current Directions in Psychological…•2016

  • Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government

    Open Access•Dan M Kahan, Ellen Peters et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2017

  • When credibility attacks

    Open Access•Zakary L Tormala, Pablo Briñol et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2005

  • Again and again (and again)

    Open Access•Thomas Koch•Studies in Communication and Media•2017

  • The Effect of Fact‐Checking on Elites

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Grassroots Mobilization and Voter Turnout in 2004

    Daniel E Bergan•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  • Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era

    Open Access•Scott J Basinger, Scott Basinger•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections

    Open Access•Ullrich K H Ecker, Li Chang Ang•Political Psychology•2019

  • Fighting the Past

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Thomas Zeitzoff•Political Psychology•2018

  • Belief Echoes

    Esther Thorson, Emily Thorson•Political Communication•2016

  • The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations

    Open Access•Carolyn L Funk•Political Behavior•1996

  • Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans

    Open Access•Ryan L Claassen, Michael J Ensley•Political Behavior•2016

  • Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Ethan Porter et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • Does Time Heal All Wounds? Sex Scandals, Tax Evasion, and the Passage of Time

    Open Access•David Doherty, Conor M Dowling et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology

    Open Access•John T Jost•Political Psychology•2017

  • The Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue

    Open Access•Oliver Hahl, Minjae Kim et al.•American Sociological Review•2018

Unique citing works39
Citations per year5,57
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 39

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae