Can Voters Predict Changes in Theor Own Attitudes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6337889 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Diane Lowenthal (0000-0001-8194-035X, Bucknell University), G Loewenstein (0000-0003-2790-0474, Carnegie Mellon University) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 65-87 |
| Publication date | 2001-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/0162-895x.00226 |
| OpenAlex | W1998520204 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 16 |
Although scholars have established that voters have unstable preferences (e.g., Converse, 1964; Zaller, 1992) and that they are not accurate when recalling past preferences (e.g., Markus, 1986; Niemi, Katz, & Newman, 1980; Smith, 1984), existing research has not systematically explored whether voters can accurately predict the changing nature of their own opinions. The question of whether whether people recognize the instability of their political preferences was explored in a random sample of Pennsylvania registered voters who were surveyed in August and October 1996, during the presidential election campaign. The first survey elicited respondents' positions on two political issues (welfare reform and the environment) and on the two major candidates, and also asked them to estimate the likelihood that each of these positions would change during the next 2 months. The second survey elicited positions at that time and also asked voters to recall their prior positions. Measured both by expectations and recall, respondents tended to underestimate the degree to which their own positions would change or had changed over time. This research has implications for the use of public opinion polling and more broadly for the practice of democratic politics
Cognitive psychology · Converse · Political science · Politics · Polling · Presidential election · Presidential system · Public opinion · Recall · Voting · Voting behavior · Welfare · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Ideology and discontent
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories.
Hindsight is not equal to foresight
Out of Control
Plus ça change
Attitude importance and attitude change
Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response
The Perils of Partisan Recall
Recalling Attitudes
Stability and change in political attitudes
The Recall of Past Partisanship
Reconstructing Past Partisanship
The Stability of Political Preferences
Aggregate Stability and Individual-Level Flux in Mass Belief Systems
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2003 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |