Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Can Voters Predict Changes in Theor Own Attitudes

Bibliographic Data

ID6337889
AuthorsDiane Lowenthal (0000-0001-8194-035X, Bucknell University), G Loewenstein (0000-0003-2790-0474, Carnegie Mellon University)
Year2001
Volume22
Issue1
Pages65-87
Publication date2001-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/0162-895x.00226
OpenAlexW1998520204
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited16

Although scholars have established that voters have unstable preferences (e.g., Converse, 1964; Zaller, 1992) and that they are not accurate when recalling past preferences (e.g., Markus, 1986; Niemi, Katz, & Newman, 1980; Smith, 1984), existing research has not systematically explored whether voters can accurately predict the changing nature of their own opinions. The question of whether whether people recognize the instability of their political preferences was explored in a random sample of Pennsylvania registered voters who were surveyed in August and October 1996, during the presidential election campaign. The first survey elicited respondents' positions on two political issues (welfare reform and the environment) and on the two major candidates, and also asked them to estimate the likelihood that each of these positions would change during the next 2 months. The second survey elicited positions at that time and also asked voters to recall their prior positions. Measured both by expectations and recall, respondents tended to underestimate the degree to which their own positions would change or had changed over time. This research has implications for the use of public opinion polling and more broadly for the practice of democratic politics

Cognitive psychology · Converse · Political science · Politics · Polling · Presidential election · Presidential system · Public opinion · Recall · Voting · Voting behavior · Welfare · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • Partisanship and principle

    Open Access•Peter Aimer, Raymond C Miller et al.•European Journal of Political…•2002

  • The Determinants and Consequences of Recall Error About Gulf War Preferences

    Open Access•Mark R Joslyn•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Ideology and discontent

    David Ernest Apter•Ideology and discontent•1967

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories.

    M G Ro, Michael Ross•Psychological Review•1989

  • Hindsight is not equal to foresight

    Baruch Fischhoff•Journal of Experimental…•1975

  • Out of Control

    Open Access•G Loewenstein•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1996

  • Plus ça change

    Open Access•Philip E Converse, Gregory B Markus•American Political Science Review•1979

  • Attitude importance and attitude change

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Journal of Experimental Social…•1988

  • Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response

    Open Access•Christopher H Achen•American Political Science Review•1975

  • The Perils of Partisan Recall

    Howard L Reiter•Public Opinion Quarterly•1980

  • Recalling Attitudes

    Tom W Smith•Public Opinion Quarterly•1984

  • Stability and change in political attitudes

    Open Access•Gregory B Markus•Political Behavior•1986

  • The Recall of Past Partisanship

    Open Access•R H Macdermid, Robert Macdermid•Canadian Journal of Political…•1989

  • Reconstructing Past Partisanship

    Richard G Niemi, Richard S Katz et al.•American Journal of Political…•1980

  • The Stability of Political Preferences

    Jon A Krosnick•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Aggregate Stability and Individual-Level Flux in Mass Belief Systems

    Open Access•Ronald Inglehart•American Political Science Review•1985

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,08
Citation span2002 - 2003 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae