Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Political Psychology of Cancel Culture

Value Framing or Group Identity

Bibliographic Data

ID6339089
AuthorsElle Diether (0009-0002-7132-1621, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, corresponding author), Suzy Yi (Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA), Lisa P Argyle (0000-0003-3109-2537, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA), Ethan C Busby (0000-0002-8931-6348, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA)
Year2024
Volume77
Issue4
Pages1130-1145
Publication date2024-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/10659129241261374
OpenAlexW4399764968
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited52

Cancel culture” has become a prominent phrase in US political commentary, with supporters and opponents relying on different value-based arguments to express their views. At the same time, these camps often fall along predictable partisan political lines. What, then, are the real motivations for promoting and opposing behaviors sometimes labeled as “canceling” in contemporary American politics? We explore this question through survey data from Pew in 2020 and two original survey experiments, conducted on the 2021 CES and a 2023 online sample. We examine how Americans define the term “cancel culture,” to what extent cancel culture is linked to both a range of core democratic values, and the role of partisanship in shaping support or opposition to specific behaviors. We observe a significant range of views about cancel culture and document connections to various political values. From our experiments, we find that partisanship is a potent driver of support for and understanding of cancel culture and that value-based framing has a weaker impact as compared to partisanship. Cancel culture provides an important case study of how Americans process conflicting norms and values, including free speech and political accountability, beyond the typical constraints of the formal political system

Framing (construction · Media studies · Political culture · Political psychology · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Academic Freedom and Politics · Computer Science · History · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Psychology

  • A psychological examination of six “bugs” in DEI discourse and a way forward focusing on maximizing human thriving and potential

    Open Access•Sukhvinder S Obhi•Equal Opportunities International•2026

  • A critical realist understanding of cancel culture in academic settings

    Open Access•David Pilgrim•Journal of Critical Realism•2026

  • Exploring the Utilization of Hashtags in Cancel Culture Messaging

    Open Access•Job Izuchukwu Okeke, Hyekyoung Han•SAGE Open•2026

  • Classroom Culture Wars

    Open Access•Brady Arrenius, Cameron Shook et al.•Religions•2025

  • Asymmetric Politics

    Matthew Grossmann, Matt Grossman et al.•Asymmetric politics•2016

  • The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology

    Leonie Huddy, David O Sears et al.•Oxford Handbook of Political…•2023

  • Whose agenda is it anyway

    Open Access•Christine Cook, Aashka Patel et al.•SN Social Sciences•2021

  • Mob Censorship

    Silvio Waisbord•Digital Journalism•2020

  • One Nation, Two Realities

    Morgan Marietta, David C Barker•One Nation, Two Realities•2019

  • Cancel Culture

    Open Access•Eve Ng•Cancel Culture•2022

  • Racist call-outs and cancel culture on Twitter

    Open Access•Gwen Bouvier•Discourse Context & Media•2020

  • Donald Trump as a cultural revolt against perceived communication restriction

    Open Access•Lucian Gideon Conway, Meredith A Repke et al.•Journal of Social and Political…•2017

  • Drag Them

    Open Access•Meredith D Clark•Communication and the Public•2020

  • Partisanship and the trolley problem

    Open Access•Michael Barber, Ryan W Davis•Research & Politics•2022

  • Boycotts, buycotts, and political consumerism in America

    Open Access•Kyle Endres, Costas Panagopoulos•Research & Politics•2017

  • No Grand Pronouncements Here

    Open Access•Eve Ng•Television & New Media•2020

  • CancelCulture

    Open Access•Edson C Tandoc, Beverly Tan Hui Ru et al.•New Media & Society•2022

  • Platform drama

    Open Access•Becca Lewis, Angèle Christin•New Media & Society•2022

  • It’s their fault

    Open Access•Ethan Zell, Christopher A Stockus et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021

  • Blame, then shame? Psychological predictors in cancel culture behavior

    Thomas S Mueller•The Social Science Journal•2021

  • The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate

    Open Access•Steven W Webster, Alan I Abramowitz•American Politics Research•2017

  • Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses

    Open Access•Miguel E Roberts, Margaret E Roberts et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Counterframing Effects

    Dennis Chong, James N Druckman•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Political Homophily in Social Relationships

    Gregory A Huber, N Malhotra•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Boycotting, Buycotting, and the Psychology of Political Consumerism

    Cindy D Kam, Maggie Deichert•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Jon Kingzette, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Cancel Culture

    Open Access•P Norris•Political Studies•2023

  • Values, Framing, and Citizens’ Thoughts about Policy Issues

    Open Access•Paul R Brewer, Kimberly Gro et al.•Political Psychology•2005

  • The Principle‐Implementation Gap in Attitudes Towards Racial Equality (and How to Close It)

    Open Access•John Dixon, K Durrheim et al.•Political Psychology•2017

  • The Strengthening of Partisan Affect

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Political Psychology•2018

  • Investigating Frame Strength

    Lene Aarøe•Political Communication•2011

  • Framing, Value Words, and Citizens' Explanations of Their Issue Opinions

    Paul R Brewer•Political Communication•2002

  • Allies or Agitators? How Partisan Identity Shapes Public Opinion about Violent or Nonviolent Protests

    Y Hsiao, Scott Radnitz•Political Communication•2021

  • How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Joseph L Sutherland•Political Behavior•2016

  • Political Considerations in Nonpolitical Decisions

    Open Access•Richard M Shafranek•Political Behavior•2021

  • Basic Personal Values Underlie and Give Coherence to Political Values

    Open Access•Shalom H Schwartz, Gian Vittorio Caprara et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • Critical Race Theory and Asymmetric Mobilization

    Open Access•Pia Deshpande, Scott Blatte et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • Values, Frames, and Persuasion in Presidential Nomination Campaigns

    Open Access•David C Barker•Political Behavior•2005

  • Political consumerism

    Open Access•Lauren Copeland, Shelley Boulianne•International Political Science…•2022

  • Ideology, Not Affect

    Open Access•Mia Costa•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expression

    Open Access•Paul Goren, Christopher M Federico et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • General and Applied Tolerance

    Mary R Jackman•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Religious Freedom in the City Pool

    Open Access•Lisa P Argyle, Rochelle Terman et al.•Politics and Religion•2022

  • Party Over Policy

    Geoffrey L Cohen•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • Principled or Partisan? The Effect of Cancel Culture Framings on Support for Free Speech

    Open Access•James J Fahey, Damon C Roberts et al.•American Politics Research•2023

  • Self-Censorship in Public Discourse

    Open Access•Glenn C Loury•Rationality and Society•1994

  • Enforcing social norms

    Open Access•Paul Billingham, Tom Parr•European Journal of Philosophy•2020

  • Framing Theory

    D Chong, James N Druckman•Annual Review of Political Science•2007

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America

    Open Access•Michael Barber, John Collins Pope•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance

    Open Access•Thomas E Nelson, Rosalee A Clawson et al.•American Political Science Review•1997

  • MeToois little more than mob rule // vs //#MeToois a legitimate form of social justice

    Open Access•Stavroula Pipyrou•Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory•2018

Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae