Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Electoral Innovation and the Alaska System

Partisanship and Populism Are Associated With Support for Top-4/Ranked-Choice Voting Rules

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6340307
AutoresJ Andrew Sinclair (0000-0002-5859-7036, Claremont McKenna College), R Michael Alvarez (0000-0002-8113-4451, California Institute of Technology), Betsy Sinclair (0000-0002-1362-589X, Washington University in St. Louis), Christian R Grose (0000-0002-3719-3155, University of Southern California)
Año2024
Volumen77
Número4
Páginas1196-1211
Fecha de publicación2024-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/10659129241263585
OpenAlexW4400833246
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas51

In 2020, Alaskans voted to adopt a nonpartisan top-4 primary followed by a ranked-choice general election. Proposals for “final four” and “final five” election systems are being considered in other states, as well as ranked-choice voting. The initial use of Alaska’s procedure in 2022 serves as a test case for examining whether such reforms may help moderate candidates avoid being “primaried.” In 2022, incumbent Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski held her seat against a Trump-endorsed Republican, Kelly Tshibaka. We use data from the 2022 election in Alaska, along with a mixed-mode survey of Alaskan voters before the general election, to test hypotheses about how voters behave in these kinds of elections, finding: (1) the moderate Republican candidate, Murkowski, likely would have lost a closed partisan primary; (2) some Democrats and independents favored the moderate Republican over the candidate of their own party, and the new rules allowed them to support her at all stages of the election, along with others who voted for her to stop the more conservative Republican candidate; and (3) that Alaskan voters are largely favorable toward the new rules, but that certain kinds of populist voters are likely to both support Trump and oppose the rules

Democracy · Economics · Electoral system · Majority rule · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Media and Politics

  • Primary Elections and Mail Voting

    Open Access•Michael Ritter, Caroline Tolbert•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Democracy More or Less

    Open Access•Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain•Democracy more or less•2014

  • The Party Decides

    Marty Cohen, David Karol et al.•Party Decides•2008

  • Democracy within Parties

    Reuven Y Hazan, Gideon Rahat•Democracy Within Parties…•2010

  • Neither Liberal nor Conservative

    Donald R Kinder, Nathan P Kalmoe•Neither Liberal nor Conservative•2017

  • American Rage

    Open Access•Steven W Webster•American Rage•2020

  • Polarization

    Nolan Mccarty•Polarization•2019

  • The American Direct Primary

    Open Access•Alan Ware•American Direct Primary•2002

  • Myth of the Independent Voter

    Keith Magleby, Elizabeth Orr et al.•Myth of the Independent Voter•1992

  • Uncivil Agreement

    L Mason•Uncivil agreement•2018

  • Populism and (liberal) democracy

    Open Access•Cas Mudde, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser•Populism in Europe and the Americas•2012

  • Primary Election Systems and Representation

    Elisabeth R Gerber, R B Morton•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1998

  • Democracy for Realists

    Christopher H Achen, Christopher Achen et al.•Democracy for Realists•2017

  • Top-Four Primaries Help Moderate Candidates via Crossover Voting

    Open Access•Sarah E Anderson, Daniel M Butler et al.•The Forum•2023

  • Demographic Disparities Using Ranked-Choice Voting? Ranking Difficulty, Under-Voting, and the 2020 Democratic Primary

    Open Access•Joseph A Coll•Politics and Governance•2021

  • Ranked Choice Voting and Attitudes toward Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Lindsay Nielson•Politics & Policy•2017

  • Self‐Reported Understanding of Ranked‐Choice Voting

    Open Access•Todd Donovan, Caroline Tolbert et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • The Party’s Primary

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus, Jeffrey Lewis Lazarus•Political Science Quarterly•2019

  • A Promise Fulfilled? Open Primaries and Representation

    Karen M Kaufmann, James G Gimpel et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • No Republican, No Vote

    Open Access•Colin A Fisk•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • Polarization without Parties

    Open Access•Seth Masket, Boris Shor•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2015

  • Reform and Representation

    Open Access•Thad Kousser, Jane H Phillips et al.•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • Extreme districts, moderate winners

    Open Access•Jesse Crosson•Political Science Research and…•2021

  • Turning Out Unlikely Voters? A Field Experiment in the Top-Two Primary

    Open Access•Seth J Hill, Thad Kousser•Political Behavior•2016

  • Has the Top Two Primary Elected More Moderates

    Open Access•Eric Mcghee, Boris Shor•Perspectives on Politics•2017

  • Measuring populism worldwide

    Open Access•P Norris•Party Politics•2020

  • The primary threat

    Open Access•Richard Barton•Party Politics•2023

  • Do Open Primaries Improve Representation? An Experimental Test of California's 2012 Top‐Two Primary

    Open Access•Douglas J Ahler, Jack Citrin et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Crashing the party

    Open Access•J Andrew Sinclair, Ian O’grady et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2018

  • American Politics in Two Dimensions

    Open Access•Joseph E Uscinski, A M Enders et al.•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology

    Open Access•Eric Mcghee, Seth Masket et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Rationality and Rationalistic Choice in the California Recall

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, D Roderick Kiewiet•British Journal of Political…•2009

  • Rise of the Trumpenvolk

    Open Access•J Eric Oliver, James E Oliver et al.•The Annals of the American…•2016

  • Estimating the unintended participation penalty under top-two primaries with a discontinuity design

    Open Access•Sheila Patterson, Shawn Patterson•Electoral Studies•2020

  • Measuring populist discourse in the United States and beyond

    Open Access•Kirk Andrew Hawkins, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser•Nature Human Behaviour•2018

  • The "Need for Chaos" and Motivations to Share Hostile Political Rumors

    Open Access•Michael Bang Petersen, Mathias Osmundsen et al.•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Crossing Over

    Open Access•Nicholas G Napolio, Christian R Grose•American Political Science Review•2022

  • What Happens When Extremists Win Primaries

    Open Access•Arnold Bennett Hall, Andrew B Hall•American Political Science Review•2015

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae