Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Effects of Judicial Campaign Activity on the Legitimacy of Courts

A Survey-based Experiment

Bibliographic Data

ID6340862
AuthorsJames L Gibson (0000-0002-2571-6596, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA), Jeffrey A Gottfried (The Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA), Michael X Delli Carpini (The Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA), Kathleen Hall Jamieson (0000-0002-4167-3688, The Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA)
Year2011
Volume64
Issue3
Pages545-558
Publication date2011-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1065912910370684
OpenAlexW2133831945
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited37

The purpose of this article is to investigate the consequences of judicial campaign activity for the perceived legitimacy of the Pennsylvania judiciary. The authors find that politicized campaign ads do detract from court support, although they find practically no difference between traditional campaign ads (e.g., presenting endorsements from groups) and strong attack ads. But this finding must be understood within the context of the 2007 Pennsylvania election increasing court support for all respondents, even those exposed to the most politicized ad content. Being exposed to politicized ads seems to retard the benefits of elections but does not eliminate them

Context (archaeology · Geography · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • Rethinking Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Amalina Yasmin Mohd Sokri•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2026

  • Testing Voter Responses to New Style Judicial Campaign Appeals

    Open Access•Mark Jonathan Mckenzie, Cynthia R Rugeley et al.•Politics & Policy•2015

  • Recusal as Remedy

    Open Access•Benjamin Edelstein, Sara C Benesh•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2024

  • Institutional Structures and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, James L Gibson•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • An Experimental Investigation of How Judicial Elections Affect Public Faith in the Judicial System

    Open Access•Anthony J Nownes, Colin Glennon•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Lawrence Baum•Law & Social Inquiry•2017

  • Effects of selection regimes on state supreme court opinion writing

    Open Access•Marcy Shieh•Social Science Quarterly•2023

  • Judges Behaving Badly

    Open Access•Melissa N Baker, Kayla S Canelo•Journal of Experimental Political…•2024

  • Campaign Support, Conflicts of Interest, and Judicial Impartiality

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Consensus and Cooperation on State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Meghan E Leonard, Joseph V Ro•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • The Two Opposing Effects of Judicial Elections on Legitimacy Perceptions

    Open Access•Benjamin Woodson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2017

  • State Courts and Policy Legitimation

    Robert J Hume•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2012

  • Attack Advertising, the White Decision, and Voter Participation in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•Melinda Gann Hall, Chris W Bonneau•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Devolving Dobbs

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Americans’ Knowledge of Their Local Judges

    Open Access•Mark Jonathan Mckenzie, Cynthia R Rugeley et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • The 2011 judicial elections in Bolivia

    Open Access•Amanda Driscoll, Michael J Nelson•Electoral Studies•2012

  • Methods of Research In Social Psychology (Cram101 Textbook Outlines - Textbook NOT Included)

    Aronson Aronson, Ellsworth Ellsworth et al.•Methods of Research In Social…•2006

  • Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations•2009

  • In Defense of Judicial Elections

    Chris W Bonneau, Melinda Gann Hall•In defense of judicial elections•2009

  • In Defense of Negativity

    John Gray Geer•In Defense of Negativity•2006

  • A systems analysis of political life

    David Easton•A systems analysis of political…•1979

  • Campaigning for Hearts and Minds

    Ted Brader•Campaigning for Hearts and Minds•2005

  • Civic engagement in American democracy

    Open Access•Clarence N Stone•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2000

  • Will ignorance & partisan election of judges undermine public trust in the judiciary

    Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Bruce W Hardy•Daedalus•2008

  • Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts

    Sara C Benesh•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Confidence in Institutions Before, During, and After “Indecision 2000

    Vincent Price, Anca Romantan•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • New-Style” Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts

    James L Gibson•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • The Resilient Voter

    Deborah Jordan Brooks•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns

    Richard R Lau, Lee Sigelman et al.•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Facial Similarity between Voters and Candidates Causes Influence

    Jeremy N Bailenson, Sharad Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Sex Differences in the Acceptability of Discrimination

    Open Access•Timur Kuran, Edward J Mccaffery•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Does the Messenger Matter? Candidate-Media Agenda Convergence and Its Effects on Voter Issue Salience

    Open Access•Danny Hayes•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • How Predictive Appeals Affect Policy Opinions

    Open Access•Jennifer Jerit, Jason Barabas•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • How Elections Change the Way Citizens View the Political System

    Open Access•Susan Banducci, Susan A Banducci et al.•British Journal of Political…•2003

  • Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy

    Open Access•Damon M Cann, Damon Cann et al.•American Politics Research•2008

  • The Sources Of Public Confidence In State Courts

    Open Access•James P Wenzel, Shaun Bowler et al.•American Politics Research•2003

  • The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined

    Open Access•Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • Campaigning for the Bench

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Law & Society Review•2008

  • Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•James L Gibson•American Political Science Review•2008

  • On the Legitimacy of National High Courts

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War

    Open Access•Scott Sigmund Gartner•American Political Science Review•2008

  • Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Steve Jessee, Stephen A Jessee•American Political Science Review•2009

  • Candidate Positioning and Voter Choice

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Robert P Van Houweling•American Political Science Review•2008

  • The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements

    Open Access•Richard R Lau, Lee Sigelman et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

  • The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Robert P Van Houweling•American Political Science Review•2009

Unique citing works16
Citations per year1,14
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae