Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

James Wilson versus the Bill of Rights

Progress, Popular Sovereignty, and the Idea of the U.S. Constitution

Bibliographic Data

ID6340876
AuthorsJames R Zink (0009-0009-0466-4959, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume67
Issue2
Pages253-265
Publication date2014-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1065912913513351
OpenAlexW2008616782
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited16

Americans today may take the Bill of Rights for granted, but its inclusion in the U.S. Constitution originally was controversial. To understand why, I turn to James Wilson, a leading statesman of the founding era and the chief opponent of the Bill of Rights. Among other things, Wilson thought a bill of rights would bind future generations to an incomplete list of rights and deprive them of the right to define individual rights over time. His arguments against a constitutional bill of rights also offer a useful view of the complexity and diversity of American founding era thought

Adversary · Bill of rights · Civil rights · Constitution · Diversity (politics · Fundamental rights · Human rights · Law and economics · Political science · Right to property · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Reason, Revelation, and the Law of Nature in James Wilson’s Lectures on Law

    Justin Buckley Dyer•American Political Thought•2020

  • Chords of Affection

    Emily Pears•American Political Thought•2017

  • James Wilson’s Science of Politics and the Moral Psychology of American Constitutionalism

    James R Zink, M Schwarze•American Political Thought•2018

  • Constitutionalism, Then and Now

    Jonathan Gienapp•American Political Thought•2025

  • James Wilson's Reidian Revolution Principle

    Open Access•David H Peters•Journal of Scottish Philosophy•2025

  • The Complete Anti-Federalist

    Herbert J Storing, Murray Dry•Complete Anti-Federalist•1981

  • Declaration of independence

    Gabriella Jóźwiak•Children and Young People Now•2015

  • Identity and Diversity in the History of Ideas

    S Adam Seagrave•Journal of the History of Ideas•2012

  • The Political and Legal Philosophy of James Wilson, 1742-1798

    John P Kaminski, Mark David Hall et al.•Journal of the Early Republic•1997

  • Response to S. Adam Seagrave’s “How Old Are Modern Rights

    Brian Tierney•Journal of the History of Ideas•2011

  • Ratifying the Constitution

    Richard B Bernstein, Michael Allen Gillespie et al.•Journal of American History•1990

  • To make a nation

    Nigel Bowles•International Affairs•1994

  • Origins of the Bill of Rights

    Mark A Graber, Leonard W Levy•American Journal of Legal History•2000

  • Rethinking America's Modernity

    Eduardo A Velásquez•Polity•1996

  • Should We Venerate That Which We Cannot Love? James Madison on Constitutional Imperfection

    Open Access•Jeremy D Bailey•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • How Old Are Modern Rights

    Adam Seagrave, S Adam Seagrave•Journal of the History of Ideas•2011

  • James Wilson and the Relation of the Scottish Metaphysics to American Political Thought

    Open Access•Arnaud B Leavelle•Political Science Quarterly•1942

  • The Language of Liberty and Law

    Open Access•James R Zink•American Political Science Review•2009

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,56
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae